Garantía de calidad de la educación superior: el caso de Estados Unidos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18222/eae.v33.9022Palabras clave:
Educación Superior, Garantía de Calidad, Acreditación UniversitariaResumen
Este artículo presenta un panorama crítico sobre la garantía de calidad de la educación superior en Estados Unidos, analizando su historia, características, problemas y controversias, en un esfuerzo para extraer lecciones que sean aplicables a otros países, como Brasil. Se analizaron los rankings institucionales, la evaluación del aprendizaje de los estudiantes, el papel de los gobiernos en el proceso de acreditación universitaria y el desafío de asegurar la calidad de las instituciones con fines de lucro. Aunque se reconoce que no hay un modelo ideal para evaluar las instituciones de educación superior, se enumeran las recomendaciones extraídas de la experiencia norteamericana que posiblemente aporten contribuciones para mejorar los marcos de garantía de calidad en otras partes del mundo.
Descargas
Citas
ALTBACH, P. AHELO: the myth of measurement and comparability. University World News, n. 367, p. 1-4, 15 May 2015. Disponível em: https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20150515064746124. Acesso em: 7 maio 2021.
ALZAFARI, K.; URSIN, J. Implementation of quality assurance standards in European higher education: does context matter? Quality in Higher Education, v. 25, n. 1, p. 58-75, Mar. 2019. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13538322.2019.1578069. Acesso em: 20 set. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2019.1578069
AMERICAN COUNCIL OF TRUSTEES AND ALUMNI – ACTA. Why accreditation doesn’t work and what policymakers can do about it. Washington, DC: American Council of Trustees and Alumni, 2007.
AMERICAN COUNCIL ON EDUCATION – ACE. Assuring academic quality in the 21st century: self-regulation in a new era. Washington, DC: American Council on Education, 2012.
ANGULO, A. J. Diploma mills: how for-profit colleges stiffed students, taxpayers, and the American dream. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/book.44879
ANTONIO, A. L.; CARNOY, M.; NELSON, C. R. The United States of America: the changes and challenges in a highly decentralized system. In: CARNOY, M.; FROUMIN, I.; LESHUKOV, O.; MARGINSON, S. Higher education in federal countries: a comparative study. New York: Sage, 2018. p. 37-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9789353280734.n2
BILLING, D. International comparisons and trends in external quality assurance of higher education. Higher Education, v. 47, p. 113-137, Jan. 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HIGH.0000009804.31230.5e
BRENNAN, J.; SHAH, T. Managing quality in higher education: an international perspective on institutional assessment and change. Buckingham: OECD; SRHE; Open University Press, 2001.
CARNOY, M.; FROUMIN, I.; LESHUKOV, O.; MARGINSON, S. (org.). Higher education in federal countries: a comparative study. New York: Sage, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9789353280734
COUNCIL FOR HIGHER EDUCATION ACCREDITATION – CHEA. CHEA Almanac on-line. Washington, DC: Council for Higher Education Accreditation, s.d. Disponível em: https://www.chea.org/chea-almanac-online#figure4-2. Acesso em: 7 maio 2021.
DIAS SOBRINHO, J. Avaliação: políticas educacionais e reformas da educação superior. São Paulo: Cortez, 2003.
DICKESON, R. C. The need for accreditation reform. Washington, DC: USDE, 2006.
EATON, J. U.S. accreditation and the future of quality assurance. Washington, DC: Council for Higher Education Accreditation, 2012.
GASTON, P. L. The challenge of Bologna. Sterling, VA: Stylus, 2010.
GASTON, P. L. Higher education quality assurance: how it is changing, why it must. Sterling, VA: Stylus, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/he.20113
GILLEN, A.; BENNETT, D. L.; VEDDER, R. Inmates running the asylum. Washington, DC: Center for College Affordability and Productivity, 2010.
GVARAMADZE, I. From quality assurance to quality enhancement in the European higher education area. European Journal of Education, v. 43, n. 4 (special edition), p. 443-455, Nov. 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2008.00376.x
HALPERIN, D. Stealing America’s future: how for-profit colleges scam taxpayers and ruin students’ lives. Washington, DC: Republic Report, 2014.
HARVEY, L.; ASKLING, B. Quality in higher education. In: BEGG, R. (ed.). The dialogue between higher education theory and practice. Amsterdam, NE: Kluer Academic Publishers, 2003.
HENTSCHKE, G. C.; LECHUGA, V. M.; TIERNEY, W. G. For-profit colleges and universities: their markets, regulation, performance, and place in higher education. Herndon, VA: Stylus, 2010.
KINSER; K.; LEVY, D. C. For-profit higher education: U.S. tendencies, international echoes. In: FORREST, J. F.; ALTBACH, P. G. (ed.). International handbook of higher education. New York, NY: Springer, 2007. p. 107-119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4012-2_7
KNOBEL, M.; VERHINE, R. E. Brazil’s for-profit higher education dilemma. International Higher Education, n. 89, p. 23-24, 2017. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.6017/ihe.2017.89.9843. Acesso em: 30 ago. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6017/ihe.2017.89.9843
LIM, D. Quality assurance in higher education: a study in developing countries. Oxfordshire, GB: Routledge, 2017.
NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS – NCES. 2018 Tables and Figures. Digest of Education Statistics. National Center for Education Statistics, 2018. Disponível em: https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d18/tables/dt18_303.20.asp. Acesso em: 23 jul. 2021.
NEAVE, G. The evaluation state reconsidered. European Journal of Education, v. 33, n. 3, p. 265-284, Sept. 1998.
ROKSA, J.; ARUM, R.; COOK, A. Defining and assessing learning in higher education. In: ARUM, R.; ROKSA, J.; COOK, A. Improving quality in American higher education: learning outcomes and assessments for the 21st century. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2016.
SCHWARTZMAN, S. The uses and abuses of educational assessment in Brazil. Prospects, v. 43, p. 269-288, Sept. 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-013-9275-9
SHAVELSON, R. J. Measuring college learning responsibility: accountability in a new era. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2009.
SHIREMAN, R. The policies that work – and don’t work – to stop predatory for-profit colleges. San Francisco, CA: The Century Foundation, 2019. Disponível em: https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/bitstream/handle/10919/90714/ForProfitpolicies.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. Acesso em: 23 jul. 2021.
SUSKIE, L. Assessing student learning: a common-sense guide. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2018.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION – USDE. Accreditation in the United States. Washington, DC: United States Department of Education, s.d. Disponível em: https://www2.ed.gov/admins/finaid/accred/accreditation_pg2.html#U.S. Acesso em: 7 maio 2021.
UNITED STATES SENATE. For profit higher education: report of the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee. Washington, DC: U.S. Senate, 2012.
VAN VUGHT, C.; WESTERHEIJDEN, D. F. Quality management and quality assurance in European higher education: methods and mechanisms. Luxembourg: Office of the Official Publications of the European Commission, 1993.
VERHINE, R. E.; DANTAS, L. V. Higher education evaluation and regulation in Brazil. In: David, M. E.; Arney, M. J. Sage Encyclopedia of Higher Education. New York: Sage, 2020. p. 84-85.
VIDOVICH, L. Quality assurance in Australian higher education: globalization and ‘steering at a distance’. Higher Education, v. 43, n. 3, p. 391-408, Apr. 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014616110418
WESTERN ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOLS AND COLLEGES – WASC. 2013 Handbook of accreditation revised. Alameda, CA: Western Association of Schools and Colleges – Senior College and University Commission, 2013.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2022 Estudos em Avaliação Educacional

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
Los autores que publican en esta revista concuerdan con los siguientes términos:
a. Los autores mantienen los derechos de autor y conceden a la revista el derecho de primera publicación, con el trabajo licenciado, simultáneamente, bajo la Licencia Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) que permite compartir el trabajo con reconocimiento de la autoría y publicación inicial en esta revista.
b. Los autores tienen autorización para asumir, separadamente, contratos adicionales, para distribución no exclusiva de la versión del trabajo publicada en esta revista (ej.: publicar en repositorio institucional o como capítulo de libro), con reconocimiento de la autoría y publicación inicial en esta revista.
c. Los autores tienen autorización y son estimulados para publicar y distribuir sus trabajos on-line (ej.: en repositorios institucionales o en su respectiva página personal en la Internet) en cualquier fecha antes o durante el proceso editorial, ya que esto puede generar modificaciones productivas, así como aumentar el impacto y las citas del trabajo publicado (Véase: El Efecto del Acceso Libre).