Higher education quality assurance: the case of the United States
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18222/eae.v33.9022Keywords:
Higher Education, Quality Assurance, University AccreditationAbstract
The purpose of this article is to provide an overview and critique of higher education quality assurance in the context of the United States (US), reviewing the US model in terms of its history, characteristics, problems and controversies, in an effort to extract lessons that are applicable to other countries, including Brazil. The study examines topics such as institutional rankings, student learning assessment, the role of government in the university accreditation process and the challenge of assuring the quality of for-profit institutions. The article concludes with a list of recommendations extracted from the US experience that could conceivably contribute to the improvement of quality assurance frameworks in other parts of the world.
Downloads
References
ALTBACH, P. AHELO: the myth of measurement and comparability. University World News, n. 367, p. 1-4, 15 May 2015. Disponível em: https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20150515064746124. Acesso em: 7 maio 2021.
ALZAFARI, K.; URSIN, J. Implementation of quality assurance standards in European higher education: does context matter? Quality in Higher Education, v. 25, n. 1, p. 58-75, Mar. 2019. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13538322.2019.1578069. Acesso em: 20 set. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2019.1578069
AMERICAN COUNCIL OF TRUSTEES AND ALUMNI – ACTA. Why accreditation doesn’t work and what policymakers can do about it. Washington, DC: American Council of Trustees and Alumni, 2007.
AMERICAN COUNCIL ON EDUCATION – ACE. Assuring academic quality in the 21st century: self-regulation in a new era. Washington, DC: American Council on Education, 2012.
ANGULO, A. J. Diploma mills: how for-profit colleges stiffed students, taxpayers, and the American dream. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/book.44879
ANTONIO, A. L.; CARNOY, M.; NELSON, C. R. The United States of America: the changes and challenges in a highly decentralized system. In: CARNOY, M.; FROUMIN, I.; LESHUKOV, O.; MARGINSON, S. Higher education in federal countries: a comparative study. New York: Sage, 2018. p. 37-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9789353280734.n2
BILLING, D. International comparisons and trends in external quality assurance of higher education. Higher Education, v. 47, p. 113-137, Jan. 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HIGH.0000009804.31230.5e
BRENNAN, J.; SHAH, T. Managing quality in higher education: an international perspective on institutional assessment and change. Buckingham: OECD; SRHE; Open University Press, 2001.
CARNOY, M.; FROUMIN, I.; LESHUKOV, O.; MARGINSON, S. (org.). Higher education in federal countries: a comparative study. New York: Sage, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9789353280734
COUNCIL FOR HIGHER EDUCATION ACCREDITATION – CHEA. CHEA Almanac on-line. Washington, DC: Council for Higher Education Accreditation, s.d. Disponível em: https://www.chea.org/chea-almanac-online#figure4-2. Acesso em: 7 maio 2021.
DIAS SOBRINHO, J. Avaliação: políticas educacionais e reformas da educação superior. São Paulo: Cortez, 2003.
DICKESON, R. C. The need for accreditation reform. Washington, DC: USDE, 2006.
EATON, J. U.S. accreditation and the future of quality assurance. Washington, DC: Council for Higher Education Accreditation, 2012.
GASTON, P. L. The challenge of Bologna. Sterling, VA: Stylus, 2010.
GASTON, P. L. Higher education quality assurance: how it is changing, why it must. Sterling, VA: Stylus, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/he.20113
GILLEN, A.; BENNETT, D. L.; VEDDER, R. Inmates running the asylum. Washington, DC: Center for College Affordability and Productivity, 2010.
GVARAMADZE, I. From quality assurance to quality enhancement in the European higher education area. European Journal of Education, v. 43, n. 4 (special edition), p. 443-455, Nov. 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2008.00376.x
HALPERIN, D. Stealing America’s future: how for-profit colleges scam taxpayers and ruin students’ lives. Washington, DC: Republic Report, 2014.
HARVEY, L.; ASKLING, B. Quality in higher education. In: BEGG, R. (ed.). The dialogue between higher education theory and practice. Amsterdam, NE: Kluer Academic Publishers, 2003.
HENTSCHKE, G. C.; LECHUGA, V. M.; TIERNEY, W. G. For-profit colleges and universities: their markets, regulation, performance, and place in higher education. Herndon, VA: Stylus, 2010.
KINSER; K.; LEVY, D. C. For-profit higher education: U.S. tendencies, international echoes. In: FORREST, J. F.; ALTBACH, P. G. (ed.). International handbook of higher education. New York, NY: Springer, 2007. p. 107-119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4012-2_7
KNOBEL, M.; VERHINE, R. E. Brazil’s for-profit higher education dilemma. International Higher Education, n. 89, p. 23-24, 2017. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.6017/ihe.2017.89.9843. Acesso em: 30 ago. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6017/ihe.2017.89.9843
LIM, D. Quality assurance in higher education: a study in developing countries. Oxfordshire, GB: Routledge, 2017.
NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS – NCES. 2018 Tables and Figures. Digest of Education Statistics. National Center for Education Statistics, 2018. Disponível em: https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d18/tables/dt18_303.20.asp. Acesso em: 23 jul. 2021.
NEAVE, G. The evaluation state reconsidered. European Journal of Education, v. 33, n. 3, p. 265-284, Sept. 1998.
ROKSA, J.; ARUM, R.; COOK, A. Defining and assessing learning in higher education. In: ARUM, R.; ROKSA, J.; COOK, A. Improving quality in American higher education: learning outcomes and assessments for the 21st century. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2016.
SCHWARTZMAN, S. The uses and abuses of educational assessment in Brazil. Prospects, v. 43, p. 269-288, Sept. 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-013-9275-9
SHAVELSON, R. J. Measuring college learning responsibility: accountability in a new era. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2009.
SHIREMAN, R. The policies that work – and don’t work – to stop predatory for-profit colleges. San Francisco, CA: The Century Foundation, 2019. Disponível em: https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/bitstream/handle/10919/90714/ForProfitpolicies.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. Acesso em: 23 jul. 2021.
SUSKIE, L. Assessing student learning: a common-sense guide. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2018.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION – USDE. Accreditation in the United States. Washington, DC: United States Department of Education, s.d. Disponível em: https://www2.ed.gov/admins/finaid/accred/accreditation_pg2.html#U.S. Acesso em: 7 maio 2021.
UNITED STATES SENATE. For profit higher education: report of the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee. Washington, DC: U.S. Senate, 2012.
VAN VUGHT, C.; WESTERHEIJDEN, D. F. Quality management and quality assurance in European higher education: methods and mechanisms. Luxembourg: Office of the Official Publications of the European Commission, 1993.
VERHINE, R. E.; DANTAS, L. V. Higher education evaluation and regulation in Brazil. In: David, M. E.; Arney, M. J. Sage Encyclopedia of Higher Education. New York: Sage, 2020. p. 84-85.
VIDOVICH, L. Quality assurance in Australian higher education: globalization and ‘steering at a distance’. Higher Education, v. 43, n. 3, p. 391-408, Apr. 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014616110418
WESTERN ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOLS AND COLLEGES – WASC. 2013 Handbook of accreditation revised. Alameda, CA: Western Association of Schools and Colleges – Senior College and University Commission, 2013.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Estudos em Avaliação Educacional

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the paper simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) license that allows the sharing of the paper with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the paper published in this journal (for example publishing in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their paper on-line (for example in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any moment before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes, as well as increase the impact and citation of the published paper (See The Effect of Open Access).