O uso de rubricas na educação básica: Revisão e recomendações

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18222/eae.v35.10803

Palavras-chave:

Rubricas, Avaliação, Sucesso Acadêmico, Motivação para o Aprendizado

Resumo

Esta revisão crítica de 17 estudos sobre o uso de rubricas e outros instrumentos referenciados por critérios na educação básica teve dois propósitos. O primeiro foi analisar estudos referentes somente ao ensino fundamental e médio, porque as análises anteriores eram muito voltadas para estudos relativos ao ensino superior. O segundo foi usar esses estudos como base para recomendações que possam ser úteis para os professores em sala de aula e para os formadores de professores e gestores escolares que trabalham com eles. Três recomendações para o uso de rubricas com alunos do ensino fundamental e médio resultaram da presente revisão: (1) garantir que as rubricas sejam de alta qualidade; (2) planejar atividades que envolvam ativamente os alunos com as rubricas; (3) usar rubricas para vincular a avaliação formativa com a atribuição de notas.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Susan M. Brookhart, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh-PA, Estados Unidos

Susan M. Brookhart is Professor Emerita in the School of Education at Duquesne University and an independent educational consultant and author based in Los Angeles, CA. Dr. Brookhart’s research interests include the role of both formative and summative classroom assessment in student motivation and achievement, the connection between classroom assessment and large-scale assessment, and grading. Dr. Brookhart also works with schools, districts, regional educational service units, universities, and states doing professional development.

Referências

Andrade, H. G. (2000). Using rubrics to promote thinking and learning. Educational Leadership, 57(5), 13-18.

Auxtero, L. C., & Callaman, R. A. (2021). Rubric as a learning tool in teaching application of derivatives in basic calculus. Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education, 6(1), 46-58. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v6i1.11449

Bradford, K. L., Newland, A. C., Rule, A. C., & Montgomery, S. E. (2016). Rubrics as a tool in writing instruction: Effects on the opinion essays of first and second graders. Early Childhood Education Journal, 44(5), 463-472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-015-0727-0

Brookhart, S. M. (2013). How to create and use rubrics for formative assessment and grading. ASCD.

Brookhart, S. M. (2018). Appropriate criteria: Key to effective rubrics. Frontiers in Education, 3, Article 22. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00022

Brookhart, S. M., & Chen, F. (2015). The quality and effectiveness of descriptive rubrics. Educational Review, 67(3), 343-368. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2014.929565

Chen, F., & Andrade, H. (2018). The impact of criteria-referenced formative assessment on fifth grade students’ theater arts achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 111(3), 310-319. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2016.1255870

Chen, F., Lui, A., Andrade, H., Valle, C., & Mir, H. (2017). Criteria-referenced formative assessment in the arts. Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Accountability, 29(3), 297-314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-017-9259-z

Gallego-Arrufat, M. J., & Dandis, M. (2014). Rubrics in a secondary mathematics class. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 9(1-2), 75-84. https://www.iejme.com/download/rubrics-in-a-secondary-mathematics-class.pdf

Hsia, L., Huang, I., & Hwang, G. (2016). A web-based peer-assessment approach to improving junior high school students’ performance, self-efficacy, and motivation in performing arts courses. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(4), 618-632. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1103675

Hubber, P., Widjaja, W., & Aranda, G. (2022). Assessment of an interdisciplinary project in science and mathematics: Opportunities and challenges. Teaching Science, 68(1), 13-25. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1346068

Idris, S. H., Jawawi, R., Mahadi, M. A., Matzin, R., Shahrill, M., Jaidin, J. H., Petra, N. A., & Mundia, L. (2017). The use of rubrics in developing students’ understanding of history. Advanced Science Letters, 23(2), 901-904. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.7432

Jonsson, A. (2010). The use of transparency in the ‘Interactive examination’ for student teachers. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17(2), 183-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695941003694441

Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2(2), 130-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002

Kennedy, E., & Shiel, G. (2022). Writing assessment for communities of writers: Rubric validation to support formative assessment of writing in Pre-K to grade 2. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 29(2), 127-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2022.2047608

Kim, J. (2019). Effects of rubric-referenced self-assessment training on Korean high school students’ English writing. English Teaching, 74(3), 79-111. https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.74.3.201909.79

King, B., Raposo, D., & Gimenez, M. (2016). Promoting student buy-in: Using writing to develop mathematical understanding. Georgia Educational Researcher, 13(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.20429/ger.2016.130202

Liu, C. C., Lu, K. H., Wu, L. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2016). The impact of peer review on creative selfefficacy and learning performance in Web 2.0 learning activities. Educational Technology & Society, 19(2). 286-297. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.19.2.286

Mahmood, D., & Jacobo, H. (2019). Grading for growth: Using sliding scale rubrics to motivate struggling learners. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 13(2), Article 10. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1844

McTighe, J., & Frontier, T. (2022). How to provide better feedback through rubrics. Educational Leadership, 79(7), 17-23.

Nsabayezu, E., Mukiza, J., Iyamuremye, A., Mukamanzi, O. U., & Mbonyiryivuze, A. (2022). Rubric-based formative assessment to support students’ learning of organic chemistry in the selected secondary schools in Rwanda: A technology-based learning. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 12251-12271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11113-5

Panadero, E., & Jonsson, A. (2013). The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: A review. Educational Research Review, 9, 129-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.002

Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., Pinedo, L., & Fernández-Castilla, B. (2023). Effects of rubrics on academic performance, self-regulated learning, and self-efficacy: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychology Review, 35, Article 113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09823-4

Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., & Strijbos, J.-W. (2016). Scaffolding self-regulated learning through self-assessment and peer assessment: Guidelines for classroom implementation. In D. Laveault, & L. Allal (Eds.), Assessment for learning: Meeting the challenge of implementation (pp. 311-326). Springer.

Reddy, Y. M., & Andrade, H. (2010). A review of rubric use in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(4), 435-448. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930902862859

Safadi, R. (2017). Self-diagnosis as a tool for supporting students’ conceptual understanding and achievements in physics: The case of 8th-graders studying force and motion. Physics Education, 52(1), Article 14002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/52/1/014002

Safadi, R., & Saadi, S. (2021). Learning from self-diagnosis activities when contrasting students’ own solutions with worked examples: The case of 10th graders studying geometric optics. Research in Science Education, 51, 523-546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9806-8

Smit, R., Bachmann, P., Blum, V., Birri, T., & Hess, K. (2017). Effects of a rubric for mathematical reasoning on teaching and learning in primary school. Instructional Science, 45(5), 603-622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-017-9416-2

Downloads

Publicado

05-04-2024

Como Citar

Brookhart, S. M. (2024). O uso de rubricas na educação básica: Revisão e recomendações. Estudos Em Avaliação Educacional, 35, e10803. https://doi.org/10.18222/eae.v35.10803

Edição

v. 35 (2024)

Seção

Artigos

Licença

Copyright (c) 2024 Estudos em Avaliação Educacional

Creative Commons License

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:

a. Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons BY-NC do tipo "Atribuição Não Comercial" que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.

b. Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.

c. Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre).