Representation: transversal notion, a tool of the transdisciplinarity
Keywords:
Social Representations, Transdisciplinarity, Knowledge.Abstract
In recent years, globalization has established links among different sciences and imposed transdisciplinarity as a theme for the study of social representations. This text reflects on the ways and principles of transdisciplinarity and on the relevance of the notion of representation for the development of transdisciplinary approaches. Transdisciplinarity is different from multidisciplinarity and interdisciplinarity and to be understood requires a harmonization of concepts and tools and further discussion. Hence, the use of representation as a unifying concept mainly in regard to psychological disciplines.
Downloads
References
ALMEIDA, A.; JODELET, D. (Org.). Interdisciplinaridade e diversidade de paradigmas. Brasília: Thesaurus, 2009.
ATLAN, H. Croyances. Comment expliquer le monde. Paris: Autrement, 2014.
AUGÉ, M. La construction du monde. Paris: Maspero, 1975.
BOURDIEU, P. Ce que parler veut dire. L’économie des échanges symboliques. Paris: Fayard, 1982.
CHANGEUX, J. P. L’homme neuronal. Paris: Fayard, 1983.
CHARAUDEAU, P. Pour une interdisciplinarité “focalisée” dans les sciences humaines et sociales. Questions de communication, n. 17, p. 195-222, 2010.
CHARTIER, R. Le monde comme représentation. Annales, Economies, Sociétés, Civilisations, n. 6, p. 1505-1520, 1989.
CHARTIER, R. O mundo como representação. Estudos Avançados, São Paulo, v. 5, n. 11, p. jan./abr. 1991.
CORBIN, A.; COURTINE, J. J.; VIGARELLO, G. Histoire du corps. Paris: Seuil, 2005.
DESCOLA, P. Au delà de nature et culture. Paris: Gallimard, 2006.
DOSSE, F. L’empire du sens. L’humanisation des sciences sociales. Paris: La Découverte, 1995.
DURKHEIM, E. Représentations individuelles et représentations collectives. Sociologie et philosophie. Paris: PUF, 1967. Reimpressão da edição de 1898.
FAYE, J. P. La critique du langage et son économie. Paris: Galilée, 1973.
FRODEMAN, R.; KLEIN, J.; MITCHAM, C. (Ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
GIBBONS, M. et al. The new production of knowledge. London: Sage, 1994.
GODELIER, M. L’idéel et le matériel, pensée, économie, sociétés. Paris: Fayard, 1984.
JODELET, D. A perspectiva interdisciplinar no campo de estudo do religioso. In: FREITAS, M. H. de; PAIVA, G. J.; MORAES, C. (Ed.). Psicologia da religião no mundo ocidental contemporâneo. Brasília: Universal, 2013.
JODELET, D. Contribuições das representações sociais para a análise das relações entre educação e trabalho. In: PARDAL, L.; MARTINS, A.; SOUZA, C. de; DEL DUJO, A.; PLACCO, V. (Ed.) Educação e trabalho. Representações, competências e trajectórias. Aveiro: Editora da Universidade de Aveiro, 2007. p. 11-26.
MICHELAT, G.; SIMON, M. Classes, religion et comportements politiques. Paris: Editions Sociales, 1977.
MOSCOVICI, S. Des représentations collectives aux représentations sociales. In: JODELET, D. (Ed.). Les représentations sociales, Paris: PUF, 1989. p. 62-86.
PIAGET, J. Pensée égocentrique et pensée sociocentrique. Cahiers Vilfredo Pareto, n. 14, p. 148-160, 1976.
RIOUX, J. P.; SIRINELLI, J. F. (Ed.). Pour une histoire culturelle. Paris: Seuil, 1997.
ROBERT, P.; FAUGERON, C. La justice et son public. Les représentations sociales du système pénal. Paris: Masson, 1978.
SCHATZMAN, E. Sciences de la nature et Sciences Sociales. In: SCHATZMAN, E.; PASSET, R. (Ed.). Sciences de la nature et représentations sociales. Paris: Centre Galilée, 1993. p. 17-35.
TOURAINE, A. Penser autrement. Paris: Fayard, 2007.
WEINGART, P. A short history of knowledge formations. In: FRODEMAN, R.; KLEIN, J. T.; MICHAM, S. (Ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
WIEVIORKA, M.; OHANA, J.; DEBARLE, A. (Ed.). Les sciences sociales en mutation. Paris: Sciences Humaines, 2007.
WINDISCH, U. Pensée sociale, langage en usage et logiques autres. Lausanne: L’Age d’Homme, 1982.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Cadernos de Pesquisa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the paper simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution license that allows the sharing of the paper with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the paper published in this journal (for example publishing in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their paper on-line (for example in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any moment before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes, as well as increase the impact and citation of the published paper (See The Effect of Open Access).
