Why knowledge matters for the schools of the 21st century?
Keywords:
Knowledge, School Curriculum, Curriculum Theory, EnglandAbstract
In this paper I document the trend in both educational policy and thought in England. Instead of seeing knowledge as a source of freedom as the great philosopher of the Enlightenment would have argued, there is a worrying tendency to trust experience and see knowledge as something to be “freed from”. I will explore an alternative to this “fear of knowledge” with the idea that the curriculum of schools should represent all a student or pupil’s entitlement to what I will refer to as “powerful knowledge”. This requires a clarification of both concepts, “power” and “knowledge”. To do this I shall make reference to the concept of “powerful knowledge” as a curriculum principle, the idea that all pupils are “entitled to access to powerful knowledge” and that it is important to distinguish between a national curriculum and a school curriculum and the concepts of curriculum and pedagogy.
Downloads
References
BOGHLOSSIAN, P. Fear of knowledge: against relativism and constructivism. London: Clarendon Press, 2008.
CONNELL, R. W. Just education. Journal of Education Policy, v. 27, n. 5, p. 681-683, 2012.
CONNELL, W. F. The educational thought and influence of Matthew Arnold. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1950.
DOWLING, P. The sociology of mathematics education. Mathematical myths/pedagogical texts. London: Falmer Press, 1998.
HIRSCH, E. D. Cultural literacy: what every american needs to know. New York: First Vintage Books, 1988.
HIRST, P. Liberal education and the nature of knowledge. In: ARCHAMBAULT, R. (Ed.). Philosophical Analysis and Education. London: Routledge, 1965. p. 113-138.
HOBBES, T. Leviathan. Oxford: Oxford World Classics, 2008.
KIMBALL, R. The two cultures today: on the C. P. Snow-F. R. Leavis controversy. The New Criterion, Feb. 1994. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 6 ago. 2015.
LENNON, K. Re-enchanting the world: the role of imagination in perception. Philosophy, v. 85, n. 3, p. 375-389, July 2010. Disponível em: <http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=7808005&fulltextType=RA&fileId=S0031819110000239>. Acesso em: 11 jan. 2016.
PRING, R. Knowledge out of control. Education for Teaching, n. 89, p. 19-29, 1972.
SEARLE, J. The construction of social reality. London: Penguin Books, 1996.
WILLIAMS, R. The long revolution. London: Chatto and Windus, 1961.
WOLF, A. Review of vocational education. Washington: Department of Education, 2011.
YOUNG, M. F. D. Knowledge and control: new directions in the sociology of education. London: Collier Macmillan, 1971.
YOUNG, M. F. D. Bringing knowledge back in: from social constructivism to social realism in the sociology of education. London: Routledge, 2008.
YOUNG, M. F. D. Overcoming the crisis in curriculum studies: a knowledge based approach. Journal of Curriculum Studies, v. 45, n. 2, p. 101-118, Apr. 2013.
YOUNG, M. F. D.; MULLER, J. Three educational scenarios for the future: lesson from the sociology of knowledge. European Journal of Education, v. 45, n. 1, p. 11-27, 2010.
YOUNG, M. F. D.; MULLER, J. On the powers of powerful knowledge. Review of Education, v. 1, n. 3, p. 1-22, Dec. 2013.
YOUNG, M. F. D. et al. Knowledge and the future school: curriculum and social justice. London: Bloomsbury, 2014.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the paper simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution license that allows the sharing of the paper with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the paper published in this journal (for example publishing in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their paper on-line (for example in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any moment before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes, as well as increase the impact and citation of the published paper (See The Effect of Open Access).