Principios organizadores, habitus y prácticas familiares
Palabras clave:
Familia, Papeles de Género, Estructura Social, Desigualdad SocialResumen
La importancia atribuida a las inserciones sociales en la perspectiva de Doise sobre las representaciones sociales y en la noción de habitus de Bourdieu son discutidas e ilustradas a través de un conjunto de estudios sobre las prácticas familiares que muestran el efecto de las posiciones sociales sobre las representaciones sociales y las prácticas sociales. Los resultados revelan un consenso sobre lo que son las tareas familiares y quién debe ejecutarlas. Ellas muestran que los hombres y las mujeres concuerdan en considerar justa la distribución desigual del trabajo familiar y deseable la diferenciación de los papeles familiares entre maridos y mujeres. El nivel de escolaridad lleva a variaciones en la creencia en las diferencias naturales entre los sexos, en las representaciones formadas sobre el trabajo familiar y en la contribución efectiva de los cónyuges a las tareas familiares, sin amenazar, sin embargo, las posiciones asimétricas ocupadas por los hombres y las mujeres en la sociedad.
Descargas
Citas
AFONSO, Rosa Marina; POESCHL, Gabrielle. Representaciones del impacto de la situación de desempleo en las prácticas familares. Revista de Psicología Social, v. 21, p. 241-258, 2006.
ALLEN, Sarah M.; HAWKINS, Alan J. Maternal gatekeeping: mothers’ beliefs and behaviors that inhibit greater father involvement in family work. Journal of Marriage and the Family, v. 61, p. 199-212, 1999.
BAXTER, Janeen; WESTERN, Mark. Satisfaction with housework: examining the paradox. Sociology, v. 32, p. 101-120, 1998.
BIANCHI, Suzanne M. et al. Is anyone doing the housework? Social Forces, v. 79, p. 191-228, 2000.
BIANCHI, Suzanne M. et al. Housework: who did, does or will do it, and how much does it matter? Social Forces, v. 91, p. 55-63, 2012.
BOURDIEU, Pierre. La distinction. Paris: Editions de Minuit, 1979.
BOURDIEU, Pierre. La domination masculine. Paris: Editions du Seuil, 1998.
CLÉMENCE, Alain; DOISE, Willem; LORENZI-CIOLDI, Fabio. Prises de position et principes organisateurs des représentations sociales. In: GUIMELLI, C. (Org.). Structures et transformations des représentations sociales. Neuchâtel: Delachaux et Niestlé, 1994. p. 119-152.
COLTRANE, Scott. Research on household labor: modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. Journal of Marriage and the Family, v. 62, p. 1208-1233, 2000.
DEUTSCHER, Irwin. Choosing ancestors: some consequences of the selection from intellectual traditions. In: FARR, R. M.; MOSCOVICI, S. (Org.). Social representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984. p. 71-100.
DOISE, Willem. Les représentations sociales: définition d’un concept. Connexions, v. 45, p. 243-253, 1985.
DOISE, Willem. Attitudes et représentations sociales. In: JODELET, D. (Org.). Les representations sociales. Paris: PUF, 1989a. p. 220-238.
DOISE, Willem. Cognitions et représentations sociales. In: JODELET, D. (Org.). Les representations sociales. Paris: PUF, 1989b. p. 341-362.
DOISE, Willem. Les représentations sociales. In: GHIGLIONE, R.; BONNET, C.; RICHARD, J. F. (Org.). Traité de psychologie cognitive. Paris: Dunod, 1990. p.113-174.
DOISE, Willem. L’ancrage dans les études sur les représentations sociales. Bulletin de Psychologie, v. 45, p. 189-195, 1992.
DOISE, Willem. Droits de l’homme et force des idées. Paris: PUF, 2001.
DOISE, Willem; CLÉMENCE, Alain. La problématique des droits humains et la psychologie sociale. Connexions, v. 67, p. 9-27, 1996.
DOISE, Willem, CLÉMENCE, Alain; LORENZI-CIOLDI, Fabio. Représentations sociales et analyses de données. Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble, 1992.
DOISE, Willem; SPINI, Dario; CLÉMENCE, Alain. Human rights studied as social representations in a cross-national context. European Journal of Social Psychology, v. 29, p. 1-29, 1999.
EUROPEAN INSTITUTE FOR GENDER EQUALITY. Gender equality index 2015 report. Vilnius, Lithuania: EIGE, 2015. Disponível em: http://eige.europa.eu/rdc/eige-publications/genderequality-index-2015-measuring-gender-equality-european-union-2005-2012-report>. Acesso em: 30 jan. 2016.
EVERTSSON, Marie; NERMO, Magnus. Dependence within families and division of labor: comparing Sweden and the United States. Journal of Marriage and the Family, v. 66, p. 1272-1286, 2004.
FAGAN, Jay; BARNETT, Marina. The relationship between maternal gatekeeping, paternal competence, mothers’ attitudes about the father role, and father involvement. Journal of Family Issues, v. 24, p. 1020-1043, 2003.
FARR, Robert M. Representaçoes sociais: a teoria e sua história. In: JOVCHELOVITCH, S.; GUARESCHI, P. (Org.). Textos em representações sociais. Petrópolis, RJ: Brasil, 1995. p. 31-59.
FERREE, Myra M. The gender division of labor in two-earner marriages: dimensions of variability and change. Journal of Family Issues, v. 12, p. 158-180, 1991.
GOUGH, Margaret; KILLEWALD, Alexandra. Unemployment in families. The case of housework. Journal of Marriage and Family, v. 73, p. 1085-1100, 2011.
GREENSTEIN, Theodore N. Husbands’ participation in domestic labor: interactive effects of wives’ and husbands’ gender ideology. Journal of Marriage and the Family, v. 58, p. 585-595, 1996.
GREENSTEIN, Theodore N. Economic dependence, gender, and the division of labor in the home: a replication and extension. Journal of Marriage and the Family, v. 62, p. 322-335, 2000.
GUPTA, Sanjiv. Her money, her time: women’s earnings and their housework hours. Social Sciences Research, v. 35, p. 975-999, 2006.
HARRE, Rom. Social representations. British Journal of Psychology, v. 76, n. 1, p. 138-140, Feb. 1985. Book review.
HERLA, Genevieve. Partage des responsabilités familiales, attitudes et comportements effectifs. Les Cahiers de Psychologie Sociale, v. 35, p. 9-50, 1987.
INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANIZATION. Women at work. Trends 2016. Geneva: ILO, 2016.
Disponível em: <http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/---publ/documents/publication/wcms_457317.pdf>. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2016.
JAHODA, Gustav. Critical notes and reflections on “social representations”. European Journal of Social Psychology, v. 18, p. 195-209, 1988.
KITTEROD, Ragni H.; PETTERSEN, Silje V. Making up for mothers’ employed working hours? Housework and childcare among Norwegian fathers. Work, Employment and Society, v. 20, p. 473-492, 2006.
KNIBIEHLER, Yvonne. Les médecins des Lumieres et la “nature féminine”. In: MORINROTUREAU, Evelyne. (Org.). 1789-1799: Combats de femmes. Paris: Editions Autrement, 2003. p. 127-142.
KRANICHFELD, Marion L. Rethinking family power. Journal of Family Issues, v. 8, p. 42-56, 1987.
LARSON, Reed W.; RICHARDS, Maryse H.; PERRY-JENKINS, Maureen. Divergent worlds: the daily emotional experience of mothers and fathers in the domestic and public spheres. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, v. 67, p. 1034-1046, 1994.
MARKUS, Hasel; ZAJONC, Robert B. The cognitive perspective in social psychology. In: LINDZEY, Gardner; ARONSON, Elliot. (Org.). The handbook of social psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1985. v. 1, p. 137-230.
MIKULA, Gerold. Justice in the family: multiple perspectives in the division of labor. Introduction. Social Justice Research, v. 11, p. 211-213, 1998.
MOSCOVICI, Serge. La psychanalyse, son image et son public. Paris: PUF, 1961, 1976.
MOSCOVICI, Serge. On social representations. In: FORGAS, Joseph P. (Org.). Social cognition: perspectives on everyday understanding. London: Academic Press, 1981. p. 181-209.
MOSCOVICI, Serge. The phenomenon of social representations. In: FARR, Robert M.; MOSCOVICI, Serge (Org.). Social representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984. p. 3-69.
MOSCOVICI, Serge. Notes towards a description of social representations. European Journal of Social Psychology, v. 18, p. 211-250, 1988.
MÜLLER, Ursula. The micropolitics of gender differences in family life. In: FERREIRA, V.; TAVARES, T.; PORTUGAL, S. (Org.). Shifting bonds, shifting bounds. Oeiras: Celta, 1998. p. 329-344.
ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT. Closing the gender gap. Paris: OCDE, 2012. Disponível em: <http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/social-issues-migration-health/close-the-gender-gap-now_9789264179370-en#page1>. Acesso em: 20 mar. 2016.
OLIVEIRA, Natércia. Representações sociais de género e o seu impacto nas práticas familiares. Dissertaçao (Mestrado) – Universidade do Porto, Porto, 2010.
PLECK, Joseph H.; MASCIADRELLI, Brian P. Paternal involvement by U.S. residential fathers: levels, sources, and consequences. In: LAMB, Michael E. (Org.). The role of the father in child development. 4th. ed. New York: Wiley, 2004. p. 222-271.
POESCHL, Gabrielle. Trabalho doméstico e poder familiar: práticas, normas, e ideais. Análise Social, v. 35, p. 695-719, 2000.
POESCHL, Gabrielle. Inégalités sexuelles dans la mémoire collective et représentations des différences entre les sexes. Connexions, v. 80, p. 101-119, 2003.
POESCHL, Gabrielle. What family organization tells us about fairness and power in marital relationships. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, v. 1, p. 557-571, 2007.
POESCHL, Gabrielle. Social norms and the feeling of justice about unequal family practices. Social Justice Research, v. 21, p. 69-85, 2008.
POESCHL, Gabrielle. Desigualdades na divisao do trabalho familiar, sentimento de justiça e processos de comparaçao social. Análise Psicológica, v. 1, p. 29-42, 2010.
POESCHL, Gabrielle; MÚRIAS, Cláudia; RIBEIRO, Raquel. As diferenças entre os sexos: mito ou realidade? Análise Psicológica, v. 2, p. 213-228, 2003.
POESCHL, Gabrielle; RIBEIRO, Raquel. Inserçoes sociais e tomadas de posiçao: efeito das pertenças sociais nas representaçoes da globalizaçao. In: VALENTIM, J. P. (Org.). Representações sociais: perspectivas teóricas no estudo do pensamento quotidiano. No prelo.
POESCHL, Gabrielle; SILVA, Aurora. Efeito das crenças nas diferenças entre sexos na percepção e no julgamento das práticas familiares. Psicologia, Porto, v. 15, n. 1, p. 93-113, 2001.
POESCHL, Gabrielle; SILVA, Aurora; MÚRIAS, Cláudia. Papéis desejáveis e traços de personalidade apropriados: uma explicaçao motivacional. Psicologia e Educação, v. 3, n. 1, p. 121-135, jun. 2004.
POESCHL, Gabrielle et al. Representaçoes das tarefas familiares. Cadernos de Consulta Psicológica, v. 17/18, p. 161-170, 2001-2.
POESCHL, Gabrielle et al. Representations of family practices, belief in sex differences and sexism. Sex Roles, v. 55, p. 111-121, 2006.
PRESSER, Harriet B. Employment schedules among dual-earner spouses and the division of household labor by gender. American Sociological Review, v. 59, p. 348-364, 1994.
ROUX, Patricia. Couple et égalité: un ménage impossible. Lausanne: Réalités sociale, 1999.
SHELTON, Beth A.; JOHN, Daphne. The division of household labor. Annual Review of Sociology, v. 22, p. 299-322, 1996.
SINGLETON, Andrew; MAHER, JaneMaree. The “new man” is in the house: young men, social change, and housework. The Journal of Men’s Studies, v. 12, p. 227-240, 2004.
SMOCK, Pamela J.; NOONAN, Mary C. Intersections: gender, work, and family research in the United States. In: BIANCHI, Suzanne M.; CASPER, Lynne M.; KING, Rosalind B. (Org.). Work, family, health and well-being. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2005. p. 343-360.
THOMPSON, Linda; WALKER, Alexis J. Gender in families: women and men in marriage, work, and parenthood. Journal of Marriage and the Family, v. 51, p. 845-871, 1989.
TOUZARD, Hubert. Enquête psychosociologique sur les rôles conjugaux et la structure familiale. Paris: CNRS, 1967.
WEST, Candace; ZIMMERMAN, Don H. Doing gender. Gender and Society, v. 1, n. 2, p. 125-151, June 1987.
YEUNG, Jean et al. Children’s time with fathers in intact families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, v. 63, p. 136-154, 2001.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2018 Cadernos de Pesquisa
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
Los autores que publican en esta revista concuerdan con los siguientes términos:
a. Los autores mantienen los derechos de autor y conceden a la revista el derecho de primera publicación, con el trabajo licenciado, simultáneamente, bajo la Licencia Creative Commons Attribution que permite compartir el trabajo con reconocimiento de la autoría y publicación inicial en esta revista.
b. Los autores tienen autorización para asumir, separadamente, contratos adicionales, para distribución no exclusiva de la versión del trabajo publicada en esta revista (ej.: publicar en repositorio institucional o como capítulo de libro), con reconocimiento de la autoría y publicación inicial en esta revista.
c. Los autores tienen autorización y son estimulados para publicar y distribuir sus trabajos on-line (ej.: en repositorios institucionales o en su respectiva página personal en la Internet) en cualquier fecha antes o durante el proceso editorial, ya que esto puede generar modificaciones productivas, así como aumentar el impacto y las citas del trabajo publicado (Véase: El Efecto del Acceso Libre).
