Teacher well-being scale (Ebed): development and validation
Keywords:
Teachers, Well-Being, Professional Satisfaction, Measuring InstrumentAbstract
The objective of the article is to present the process of construction and validation of the Teacher Well-being Scale (Ebed). It is an instrument developed to identify the factors that contribute to teachers’ well-being with their work. Composed of 37 variables of the objective dimension of the work (socioeconomic, relational, labor activity and infrastructure), was applied in 353 Basic Education teachers who evaluated these items as to the degree of satisfaction/dissatisfaction they provide. The analyzes, performed with Pearson’s Correlation and Principal Component Analysis (PCA), show that all variables have a positive and significant correlation with the “Happy” variable (self-perception of teacher happiness with work), contributing and can be validated to measure teacher well-being.
Downloads
References
BARDIN, Laurence. Análise de conteúdo. São Paulo: Edições 70, 2011.
COLLIE, Rebecca J.; SHAPKA, Jennifer D.; PERRY, Nancy E.; MARTIN, Andrew J. Teacher Well-Being: exploring its components and a practice-oriented scale. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, v. 33, n. 8, p. 744-756, May 2015. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282915587990. Acesso em: 4 jun. 2020.
CONSTANTINO, Michel; MENDES, Dany; KUFF, Rafaela F. Econometric analysis of expenditure on research and development. Germany: Lambert Academic Publishing, 2017.
CSIKSZENTMIHALYI, Mihalyi. A Psicologia da felicidade. São Paulo: Saraiva, 1992.
CSIKSZENTMIHALYI, Mihalyi. If we are so rich, why aren’t we happy? American Psychologist, v. 54, n. 10, p. 821-827, Oct. 1999. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.10.821. Acesso em: out. 2003.
DEMO, Gisela; PASCHOAL, Tatiane. Well-Being at work scale: exploratory and confirmatory validation in the USA. Paidéia, Ribeirão Preto, v. 26, n. 63, p. 35-43, Apr. 2016. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1982-43272663201605. Acesso em: 4 jun. 2020.
GENZ, Alan; BRETZ, Frank. Computation of multivariate normal and t probabilities. Germany: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2009.
HARGRAVES, Andy; FULLAN, Michel. A escola como organização aprendente: buscando uma educação de qualidade. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2000.
HUSSON, François; JOSSE, Julie; MAZET, Sebastien L. J. FactoMineR: multivariate exploratory data analysis and data. R package version 1.30, 2012. Disponível em: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=FactoMineR. Acesso em: 4 jun. 2020.
LI, Cai; MARK, Hansen. Improving educational assessment: multivariate statistical methods. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, v. 5, n. 1, p. 19-24, Dec. 2018. Disponível em: http://doi.org/10.1177/2372732217747006. Acesso em: 4 jun. 2020.
MORO, Adriano; VINHA, Telma P.; MORAIS, Alessandra de. Avaliação do clima escolar: construção e validação de instrumentos de medida. Cadernos de Pesquisa, São Paulo, v. 49, n. 172, p. 312-334, abr./jun. 2019. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/198053146151. Acesso em: 4 jun. 2020.
REBOLO, Flavinês. Caminhos para o bem-estar docente: as estratégias de enfrentamento utilizadas pelos professores frente às adversidades do trabalho docente na contemporaneidade. Quaestio (UNISO), Sorocaba, v. 14, p. 115-131, maio 2012a.
REBOLO, Flavinês. Fontes e dinâmicas do bem-estar docente: os quatro componentes de um trabalho felicitário. In: REBOLO, F.; TEIXEIRA, L. R. M.; PERRELLI, M. A. de S. (org.). Docência em questão: discutindo trabalho e formação. Campinas, SP: Mercado de Letras, 2012b.
REBOLO, Flavinês. O bem-estar docente: limites e possibilidades para a felicidade do professor no trabalho. 2005. Tese (Doutorado em Educação) – Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2005.
REBOLO, Flavinês; BUENO, Belmira O. O bem-estar docente: limites e possibilidades para a felicidade do professor no trabalho. Revista Acta Scientiarum – Education, Maringá, v. 36, n. 2, p. 323-331, jul./dez. 2014.
RYFF, Carol D. Happiness is everything or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, v. 57, n. 6, p. 1069-1081, 1989. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069. Acesso em: dez. 2003.
RYFF, Carol D.; KEYES, Corey L. M. The structure of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, v. 69, n. 4, p. 719-727, Nov. 1995. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719. Acesso em: dez. 2003.
SCHÜTZE, Fritz. Biography analysis on the empirical base of autobiographical narratives: how to analyse autobiographical narrative interviews-Part 1. Module B.2.1. INVITEBiographical counseling in rehabilitative vocational training further education curriculum, 2007a. Disponível em: http://www.uni-magdeburg.de/zsm/projekt/biographical/1/B2.1.pdf. Acesso em: dez. 2009.
SCHÜTZE, Fritz. Biography analysis on the empirical base of autobiographical narratives: how to analyse autobiographical narrative interviews-Part 2. Module B.2.2. INVITEBiographical counseling in rehabilitative vocational training further education curriculum, 2007b. Disponível em: http://www.uni-magdeburg.de/zsm/projekt/biographical/1/B2.2.pdf. Acesso em: dez. 2009.
TEIXEIRA, Marco A. P.; BARDAGI, Marúcia P.; HUTZ, Claudio S. Escalas de exploração vocacional (EEV) para universitários. Psicologia em Estudo, Maringá, PR, v. 12, n. 1, p. 195-202, abr. 2007. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-73722007000100023. Acesso em: 4 jun. 2020.
WALTON, Richard E. Criteria for quality life. In: DAVIS, L. E.; CHERNS, A.B. The quality of working life: problems, prospects and state of the art. New York: The Free Press, v.1, 1975.
WALTON, Richard E. Quality of working life: what is it? Sloan Management Review, Cambridge, v. 15, n. 1, p. 11-21, 1973. Disponível em: http://www.sciepub.com/reference/180481. Acesso em: 4 jun. 2020.
WARR, Peter B. Work, unemployment, and mental health. Oxford: Clarendon, 1987.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Cadernos de Pesquisa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the paper simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution license that allows the sharing of the paper with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the paper published in this journal (for example publishing in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their paper on-line (for example in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any moment before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes, as well as increase the impact and citation of the published paper (See The Effect of Open Access).
