As tecnologias nos organismos internacionais: uma análise política do discurso

Autores

Palavras-chave:

Neoliberalismo, Políticas educacionais, Tecnologia da informação e da comunicação, Governabilidade

Resumo

As Tecnologias da Informação e da Comunicação (TIC) são parte essencial do discurso educativo de instituições como a OCDE e a Unesco. As pesquisas sobre a questão não têm examinado suficientemente os mecanismos ideológicos que operam por trás desses discursos educativos sobre tecnologia. Assim, o objetivo do artigo é analisar de forma discursiva os argumentos utilizados em textos de política educacional de instâncias supranacionais (OCDE e Unesco) que apoiam a implantação das TIC na Educação. Realizamos uma análise documental adotando a abordagem metodológica da Análise Política de Discurso (APD). Os resultados mostram como os discursos sobre as TIC presentes nos documentos de ambas as instituições fazem parte de uma visão da educação que precisa se adequar às demandas das sociedades e das economias neoliberais.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Juan Miguel Martínez Martínez, Universidad de Granada (UGR), Granada, Andalucía, España

Juan Miguel Martínez Martínez, Universidad de Granada (UGR), Granada, Andalucía, España
Doctor en Ciencias de la Educación, investigador en el Departamento de Didáctica de las Ciencias Sociales

Antonio Tudela Sancho, Universidad de Granada (UGR), Granada, Andalucía, España

Profesor Titular del Departamento de Didáctica de las Ciencias Sociales

Referências

Ball, S. J. (2012). Global Education Inc.: New policy networks and the neoliberal imaginary. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203803301

Ball, S. J. (2017). The education debate. Policy Press.

Ball, S. J., & Youdell, D. (2008). Hidden privatisation in public education. Education International.

Barbosa, M. G. (2020). Educação e democracia: Do risco de desarticulação a uma recomposição crítica. Cadernos de Pesquisa, 50(177), 759-773.

Berkovich, I., & Benoliel, P. (2018). Marketing teacher quality: Critical discourse analysis of OECD documents on effective teaching and TALIS. Critical Studies in Education, 0(0), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2018.1521338

Bieber, T. (2016). Soft governance in education: Lessons and prospects. In T. Bieber (Ed.), Soft governance, international organizations and education policy convergence: Comparing PISA and the Bologna and Copenhagen Processes (pp. 243-257). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47695-1_9

Bonal, X., Tarabini Castellani, A., & Verger, A. (2007). Globalización y educación: Textos fundamentales. Miño y Dávila.

Bonal, X., & Verger, A. (2016). Privatización educativa y globalización: Una realidad poliédrica. Revista de la Asociación de Sociología de la Educación, 9(2), 175-180.

Cornali, F., & Tirocchi, S. (2012). Globalization, education, information and communication technologies: What relationships and reciprocal influences? Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 2060-2069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.949

Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315834368

Fairclough, I., & Fairclough, N. (2012). Political discourse analysis: A method for advanced students. Routledge.

Foucault, M. (2005). El orden del discurso. Fabula Tusquets.

Hatcher, R. (2001). Getting down to business: Schooling in the globalised economy. Education and Social Justice, 3(2), 45-59.

Jandrić, P., & Hayes, S. (2018). Who drives the drivers? Technology as the ideology of global educational reform. In K. Saltman, & A. Means (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of global educational reform (pp. 307-322). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119082316.ch15

Landri, P. (2018). Digital governance of education: Technology, standards and europeanization of education. Bloomsbury Academic.

Levin, B. (1998). An epidemic of education policy: (What) can we learn from each other? Comparative Education, 34(2), 131-141.

Libâneo, J. C. (2016). Políticas educacionais no Brasil: Desfiguramento da escola e do conhecimento escolar. Cadernos de Pesquisa, 46(159), 38-62.

Luengo, J. J., & Saura, G. (2014). Reformas educativas globales: Privatización, biopolítica, tecnologías de control y performatividad. Témpora: Revista de Historia y Sociología de la Educación, 17, 31-48.

Luengo, J. J., & Saura, G. (2016). La performatividad en la educación: La construcción del nuevo docente y el nuevo gestor performativo. REICE: Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 11(3), 139-153.

Luzón, A., & Torres, M. (2013). Apuntes sobre la internacionalización y la globalización en educación: De la internacionalización de los modelos educativos a un nuevo modelo de gobernanza. Journal of Supranational Policies of Education, 1, 53-66.

Marfim, L., & Pesce, L. (2019). Work, teacher training, and integration of DICT to educational practices: Beyond technological rationality. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 27(89). https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.27.4168

Miguel-Revilla, D. (2020). Rendimiento académico y tecnología: Evolución del debate en las últimas décadas. Cadernos de Pesquisa, 50(178), 1122-1137.

Moltó, O. (2013). Neoliberalism, education and the integration of ICT in schools. A critical reading. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 23(2), 267-283. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2013.810168

Mueller, R. R. (2017). O novo (velho) paradigma educacional para o século XXI. Cadernos de Pesquisa, 47(164), 670-686.

Mundy, K. (2007). El multilateralismo educativo y el (des)orden mundial. In X. Bonal, A. Tarabini Castellani, & A. Verger (Eds.), Globalización y educación: Textos fundamentales (pp. 99-132). Miño y Dávila.

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Developmen –OECD. (2015). Students, computers and learning: Making the connection. OECD Publishing.

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Developmen –OECD. (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. OECD Publishing.

Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura –Unesco. (2015a). Declaración de Qingdao. Unesco. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002333/233352m.pdf

Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura –Unesco. (2015b). Leveraging information and communication technologies to achieve the Post-2015 Education Goal. Unesco. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0024/002430/243076E.pdf

Palacios, D., Hidalgo, F., Cornejo, R., & Suárez, N. (2019). Political discourse analysis: Conceptual and analytical tools for the critical study of educational policies in times of global reform. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 27(0), 47. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.27.4269

Palacios, D., Hidalgo, F., Suárez, N., & Saavedra, P. (2020). Leyendo críticamente políticas educativas en la era neoliberal: El caso chileno. Cadernos de Pesquisa, 50(175), 30-54.

Player-Koro, C., Rensfeldt, A. B., & Selwyn, N. (2018). Selling tech to teachers: Education trade shows as policy events. Journal of Education Policy, 33(5), 682-703. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2017.1380232

Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2009). Globalizing education policy. Routledge.

Robertson, S. L., & Dale, R. (2015). Towards a ‘critical cultural political economy’ account of the globalizing of education. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 13(1), 149-170. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2014.967502

Sahlberg, P. (2011). The fourth way of Finland. Journal of Educational Change, 12(2), 173-185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-011-9157-y

Saura, G. (2015a). Mecanismos, actores y espacios de privatización en y de la educación: Neoliberalismo, performatividad y redes en la política educativa española. Universidad de Granada.

Saura, G. (2015b). Think tanks y educación. Neoliberalismo de FAES en la LOMCE. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23(1), 101.

Saura, G. (2016). Neoliberalización filantrópica y nuevas formas de privatización educativa: La red global Teach For All en España. Revista de la Asociación de Sociología de la Educación (RASE), 9(2), 248-264.

Selwyn, N. (2018). Technology as a focus of education policy. In R. Papa, & S. Armfield (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of educational policy (pp. 457-477). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119218456.ch20

Sørensen, T. B., & Robertson, S. L. (2018). Reframing teachers’ work for global competitiveness. In Kenneth J. Saltman, & Alexander J. Means (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of global educational reform (pp. 87-111). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119082316.ch5

Tikly, L. (2016). The future of education for all as a global regime of educational governance. Comparative Education Review, 61(1), 22-57. https://doi.org/10.1086/689700

Tilak, J. B. (2010). Public-private partnership in education. The Hindu, 24, 1-16.

Tolofari, S. (2005). New public management and education. Policy Futures in Education, 3(1), 75-89. https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2005.3.1.11

Tripodi, Z. F., & Sousa, S. Z. (2018). Do governo à governança: Permeabilidade do Estado a lógicas privatizantes na educação. Cadernos de Pesquisa, 48(167), 228-253.

Valle, J. M. (2012). La política educativa supranacional: Un nuevo campo de conocimiento para abordar las políticas educativas en un mundo globalizado. Revista Española de Educación Comparada, 20, 109-144.

Valle, J. M. (2015). Las políticas educativas en tiempos de globalización: La educación supranacional. Bordón: Revista de Pedagogía, 67(1), 11-21.

Verger, A. (2014). Why do policy-makers adopt global education policies? Toward a research framework on the varying role of ideas in education reform. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 16(2), 14-29.

Verger, A., & Bonal, X. (2012). La emergencia de las alianzas público-privadas en la agenda educativa global: Nuevos retos para la investigación educativa. Profesorado: Revista de Curriculum y Formación del Profesorado, 16(3), 11-29.

Wilkoszewski, H., & Sundby, E. (2016). From hard to soft governance in multi-level education systems. European Journal of Education, 51(4), 447-462. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12189

Williamson, B. (2013). The future of the curriculum: School knowledge in the digital age. MIT Press.

Williamson, B. (2016). Digital education governance: An introduction. European Educational Research Journal, 15(1), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904115616630

Williamson, B. (2018a). Big data en educación: El futuro digital del aprendizaje, la política y la práctica. Morata.

Williamson, B. (2018b). Silicon startup schools: Technocracy, algorithmic imaginaries and venture philanthropy in corporate education reform. Critical Studies in Education, 59(2), 218-236. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2016.1186710

Williamson, B. (2018c). Startup schools, fast policies, and full‐stack education companies: Digitizing education reform in Silicon Valley. In Kenneth J. Saltman, & Alexander J. Means (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of global educational reform (pp. 283-305). John Wiley & Sons.

Woodward, R. (2009). The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Routledge.

Publicado

02-09-2021

Como Citar

Martínez Martínez, J. M., & Tudela Sancho, A. (2021). As tecnologias nos organismos internacionais: uma análise política do discurso. Cadernos De Pesquisa, 51, e07287. Recuperado de https://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/cp/article/view/7287

Edição

Seção

Políticas Públicas, Avaliação e Gestão