Supervisão de doutorado: Evolução das pesquisas e temáticas emergentes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1980531411661Palavras-chave:
Supervisão, Doutorado, Avaliação, OrientaçãoResumo
Este estudo analisou a evolução temporal das publicações sobre supervisão de doutorado indexadas na Web of Science de 1998 a 2023, buscando identificar os clusters temáticos da produção científica. A pesquisa utilizou métodos bibliométricos e a análise de conteúdo para examinar 401 documentos da área da educação. Os resultados revelaram um crescimento exponencial no número de publicações, com ênfase em temas como mentoria acadêmica, supervisão de tese e escrita acadêmica. A análise dos clusters temáticos evidenciou a importância da relação supervisor-supervisionado, o papel da afiliação e do controle na supervisão e a necessidade de desenvolvimento profissional dos supervisores.
Downloads
Referências
Aitchison, C., Catterall, J., Ross, P., & Burgin, S. (2012). “Tough love and tears”: Learning doctoral writing in the sciences. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(4), 435-447. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2011.559195
Al Makhamreh, M., & Stockley, D. (2020). Mentorship and well-being: Examining doctoral students’ lived experiences in doctoral supervision context. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 9(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-02-2019-0013
Amundsen, C., & McAlpine, L. (2009). “Learning supervision”: Trial by fire. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(3), 331-342. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290903068805
Andriopoulou, P., & Prowse, A. (2020). Towards an effective supervisory relationship in research degree supervision: Insights from attachment theory. Teaching in Higher Education: Critical Perspectives, 25(5), 648-661. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1731449
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
Aria, M., Misuraca, M., & Spano, M. (2020). Mapping the evolution of social research and data science on 30 years of Social Indicators Research. Social Indicators Research, 149, 803-831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02281-3
Bardin, L. (2011). Análise de conteúdo. Edições 70.
Barnes, B. J., & Austin, A. E. (2009). The role of doctoral advisors: A look at advising from the advisor’s perspective. Innovative Higher Education, 33, 297-315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-008-9084-x
Bell, A., & Treleaven, L. (2011). Looking for professor right: Mentee selection of mentors in a formal mentoring program. Higher Education, 61, 545-561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9348-0
Benmore, A. (2016). Boundary management in doctoral supervision: How supervisors negotiate roles and role transitions throughout the supervisory journey. Studies in Higher Education, 41(7), 1251-1264. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.967203
Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R., & Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2008(10), Article 10008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/p10008
Boehe, D. M. (2016). Supervisory styles: A contingency framework. Studies in Higher Education, 41(3), 399-414. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.927853
Bøgelund, P., & De Graaff, E. (2015). The road to become a legitimate scholar: A case study of international PhD students in science and engineering. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 10, 519-533. https://doi.org/10.28945/2325
Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory field. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 146-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.002
Corrêa, P. S. de A. (2012). A orientação das dissertações e teses como objeto de estudo das pesquisas acadêmicas: História e historiografia. Revista HISTEDBR On-line, 12(47), 392-416. https://doi.org/10.20396/rho.v12i47.8640059
Crossouard, B. (2008). Developing alternative models of doctoral supervision with online formative assessment. Studies in Continuing Education, 30(1), 51-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/01580370701841549
De Kleijn, R. A. M., Meijer, P. C., Brekelmans, M., & Pilot, A. (2015). Adaptive research supervision: Exploring expert thesis supervisors’ practical knowledge. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 117-130. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.934331
De Kleijn, R. A. M., Meijer, P. C., Pilot, A., & Brekelmans, M. (2014). The relation between feedback perceptions and the supervisor-student relationship in master’s thesis projects. Teaching in Higher Education: Critical Perspectives, 19(4), 336-349. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2013.860109
Deuchar, R. (2008). Facilitator, director or critical friend?: Contradiction and congruence in doctoral supervision styles. Teaching in Higher Education: Critical Perspectives, 13(4), 489-500. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510802193905
Dias, S. M. R. C., Patrus, R., & Magalhães, Y. T. de. (2011). Quem ensina um professor a ser orientador? Proposta de um modelo de orientação de monografias, dissertações e teses. Administração: Ensino e Pesquisa, 12(4), 697-721. https://doi.org/10.13058/raep.2011.v12n4.156
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Eby, L. T., Allen, T. D., Evans, S. C., Ng, T., & DuBois, D. L. (2008). Does mentoring matter? A multidisciplinary meta-analysis comparing mentored and non-mentored individuals. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72(2), 254-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2007.04.005
Fenge, L.-A. (2012). Enhancing the doctoral journey: The role of group supervision in supporting collaborative learning and creativity. Studies in Higher Education, 37(4), 401-414. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.520697
Gardner, S. K. (2008). “What’s too much and what’s too little?”: The process of becoming an independent researcher in doctoral education. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(3), 326-350. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/237031
Gattelli, R. (n.d.). Mendeley: Gerenciador de referências [Apresentação de slides]. SiBFURG. https://biblioteca.furg.br/images/Tutorial_Mendeley.pdf
Hall, L., & Burns, L. (2009). Identity development and mentoring in doctoral education. Harvard Educational Review, 79(1), 49-70. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.79.1.wr25486891279345
Halse, C., & Malfroy, J. (2010). Retheorizing doctoral supervision as professional work. Studies in Higher Education, 35(1), 79-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070902906798
Ives, G., & Rowley, G. (2005). Supervisor selection or allocation and continuity of supervision: Ph.D. students’ progress and outcomes. Studies in Higher Education, 30(5), 535-555. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070500249161
Johnson, L., Lee, A., & Green, B. (2000). The PhD and the autonomous self: Gender, rationality and postgraduate pedagogy. Studies in Higher Education, 25(2), 135-147. https://doi.org/10.1080/713696141
Khalid, S., Orynbek, G., Lianyu, C., & Tadesse, E. (2023). What goes around comes around: Shedding light on today’s doctoral student’s research socialization and who will be the future faculty. PLoS ONE, 18(5), Article e0285843. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285843
Kilicoglu, O., & Mehmetcik, H. (2021). Science mapping for radiation shielding research. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 189, Article 109721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2021.109721
Kwan, B. S. C. (2013). Facilitating novice researchers in project publishing during the doctoral years and beyond: A Hong Kong-based study. Studies in Higher Education, 38(2), 207-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.576755
Lee, A. (2008). How are doctoral students supervised? Concepts of doctoral research supervision. Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), 267-281. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802049202
Lee, A., & Kamler, B. (2008). Bringing pedagogy to doctoral publishing. Teaching in Higher Education: Critical Perspectives, 13(5), 511-523. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510802334723
Lee, A., & Murray, R. (2015). Supervising writing: Helping postgraduate students develop as researchers. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(5), 558-570. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2013.866329
Leite, G. A., Filho, & Martins, G. de A. (2006). Relação orientador-orientando e suas influências na elaboração de teses e dissertações. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 46(especial), 99-109. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-75902006000500008
Lovitts, B. E., & Nelson, C. (2000). The hidden crisis in graduate education: Attrition from Ph.D. programs. Academe, 86(6), 44-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/40251951
Macfarlane, B. (2017). The ethics of multiple authorship: Power, performativity and the gift economy. Studies in Higher Education, 42(7), 1194-1210. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1085009
Maher, M., Fallucca, A., & Halasz, H. M. (2013). Write on! Through to the Ph.D.: Using writing groups to facilitate doctoral degree progress. Studies in Continuing Education, 35(2), 193-208. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2012.736381
Maher, M., Wofford, A. M., Roksa, J., & Feldon, D. F. (2019). Doctoral student experiences in biological sciences laboratory rotations. Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education, 10(1), 69-82. https://doi.org/10.1108/SGPE-02-2019-050
McCallin, A., & Nayar, S. (2012). Postgraduate research supervision: A critical review of current practice. Teaching in Higher Education: Critical Perspectives, 17(1), 63-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/13 562517.2011.590979
Mendeley: Organize e otimize a sua pesquisa. (2018). [Apresentação de slides]. Elsevier. https://www.periodicos.capes.gov.br/images/documents/MENDELEY_AUG_2018_PORT.pdf
Nóbrega, M. H. da. (2018). Orientandos e orientadores no século XXI: Desafios da pós-graduação. Educação & Realidade, 43(3), 1055-1076. https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-623674407
Organização das Nações Unidas para a Educação, a Ciência e a Cultura (Unesco). (1998). Declaração mundial sobre educação superior no século XXI: Visão e ação, marco referencial de ação prioritária para a mudança e o desenvolvimento da educação superior. Unesco. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000140457
Overall, N. C., Deane, K. L., & Peterson, E. R. (2011). Promoting doctoral students’ research self-efficacy: Combining academic guidance with autonomy support. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(6), 791-805. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2010.535508
Robinson-Pant, A. (2009). Changing academies: Exploring international PhD students’ perspectives on “host” and “home” universities. Higher Education Research & Development, 28(4), 417-429. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360903046876
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.55.1.68
Santos, J. C. dos, Filho, & Carvalho, M. L. R. D. (1991). Orientação coletiva de mestrado na Faculdade de Educação da Unicamp. Cadernos de Pesquisa, (78), 73-79. https://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/cp/article/view/1032
Schunk, D. H., & Mullen, C. A. (2013). Toward a conceptual model of mentoring research: Integration with self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 25, 361-389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-013-9233-3
Shikoh, A. S., & Polyakov, A. (2020). A quantitative analysis of the research trends in perovskite solar cells in 2009-2019. Physica Status Solidi A: Applications and Materials Science, 217(23), Article 2000441. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.202000441
Tauchen, G., Teran Briceño, J. C., & Borges, D. S. (2023). Internacionalização da educação superior: Redes sociais e preocupações emergentes. Educação, 46(1), Artigo e44654. https://doi.org/10.15448/1981-2582.2023.1.44654
Teran Briceño, J. C., Tauchen, G., & Lobo, H. (2021). Enseñanza de la estructura espacio-tiempo: Un análisis bibliométrico (1988-2020) y futuras direcciones de investigación. Revista de Enseñanza de la Física, 33(1), 47-59. https://doi.org/10.55767/2451.6007.v33.n1.33274
Twale, D. J., Weidman, J. C., & Bethea, K. (2016). Conceptualizing socialization of graduate students of color: Revisiting the Weidman-Twale-Stein framework. The Western Journal of Black Studies, 40(2), 80-94.
Vehviläinen, S. (2009). Student-initiated advice in academic supervision. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 42(2), 163-190. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810902864560
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 Cadernos de Pesquisa
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
a. Autores mantêm os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
b. Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
c. Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho on-line (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre).
