Sempre elas? Valores e divisão do trabalho doméstico em perspectiva comparada
Palavras-chave:
Desigualdade, Relações de Gênero, Divisão Sexual do Trabalho, Trabalho DomésticoResumo
De que forma os valores de gênero e as práticas em relação ao trabalho doméstico variam segundo os contextos nacionais e as características dos indivíduos? Para responder a essa pergunta, o artigo analisa os dados do Family and Changing Gender Roles, do International Social Survey Programme (ISSP), elegendo as questões sobre os valores de gênero e práticas na divisão do trabalho doméstico de 41 países de diferentes continentes através de análise multinível. Os resultados indicam que gênero, escolaridade, horas trabalhadas, religião e religiosidade influenciam valores e práticas de gênero. Mas, enquanto o contexto nacional no qual as pessoas vivem afeta os valores de gênero, os países se mostram muito mais homogêneos no que se refere às práticas relacionadas à divisão sexual do trabalho.
Downloads
Referências
Altintas, E., & Sullivan, O. (2016). Fifty years of change updated: Cross-national gender convergence in housework. Demographic Research, 35, 455-470.
Altintas, E., & Sullivan, O. (2017). Trends in fathers’ contribution to housework and childcare under different welfare policy regimes. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 24(1), 81-108.
Araújo, C., Gama, A., Picanço, F., & Cano, I. (Orgs.). (2018). Gênero, família, e trabalho no Brasil do século XXI [Base de dados]. Gramma.
Araújo, C., Picanço, F., Cano, I., Veiga, A., & Gama, A. (2018). Evolução das percepções de gênero, trabalho e família no Brasil: 2003-2016. In C. Araújo, A. Gama, F. Picanço, & I. Cano (Orgs.), Gênero, família e trabalho no Brasil do século XXI (pp. 1-82) [Base de dados]. Gramma.
Araújo, C., & Veiga, A. D. E. C. (2017). Um difícil equilíbrio: Vida familiar e trabalho remunerado de mulheres e homens no estado do Rio de Janeiro. In C. Araújo, & A. Gama (Orgs.), Entre a casa e o trabalho: Gênero e família no Rio de Janeiro (pp. 41-83). ABE Gráfica e Editora.
Artis, J. E., & Pavalko, E. K. (2003). Explaining the decline in women’s household labor: Individual change and cohort differences. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(3), 746-761.
Barone, C., & Assirelli, G. (2020). Gender segregation in higher education: An empirical test of seven explanations. Higher Education, 79, 55-78.
Bianchi, S. M., Sayer, L. C., Milkie, M. A., & Robinson, J. P. (2012). Housework: Who did, does or will do it, and how much does it matter? Social Forces, 91(1), 55-63.
Boehnke, M. (2011). Gender role attitudes around the globe: Egalitarian vs. Traditional views. Asian Journal of Social Science, 39(1), 57-74. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43500538
Bolzendahl, C. I., & Myers, D. J. (2004). Feminist attitudes and support for gender equality: Opinion change in women and men, 1974-1998. Social Forces, 83(2), 759-789.
Charles, M., & Bradley, K. (2009). Indulging our gendered selves? Sex segregation by field of study in 44 countries. American Journal of Sociology, 114(4), 924-976.
Chatillon, A., Charles, M., & Bradley, K. (2018). Gender ideologies. In B. J. Risman, C. M. Froyum, & W. J. Scarborough (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of gender (pp. 217-226). Springer.
Coltrane, S. (2000). Research on household labor: Modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(4), 1208-1233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.01208.x
Constantin, A., & Voicu, M. (2015). Attitudes towards gender roles in cross-cultural surveys: Content validity and cross-cultural measurement invariance. Social Indicators Research, 123(3), 733-751.
Crompton, R., Brockmann, M., & Lyonette, C. (2005). Attitudes, women’s employment and the domestic division of labour: A cross-national analysis in two waves. Work, Employment and Society, 19(2), 213-233.
Crompton, R., & Lyonette, C. (2005). The new gender essentialism – Domestic and family ‘choices’ and their relation to attitudes 1. The British Journal of Sociology, 56(4), 601-620.
Davidov, E., Datler, G., Schmidt, P., & Schwartz, S. H. (2010). Testing the invariance of values in the Benelux countries with the European Social Survey: Accounting for ordinality. In E. Davidov, P. Schmidt, & J. Billiet, Cross-Cultural analysis: Methods and applications (pp. 149-168). Routledge.
Davis, S. N., & Greenstein, T. N. (2004). Cross-national variations in the division of household labor. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(5), 1260-1271.
Davis, S. N., & Greenstein, T. N. (2009). Gender ideology: Components, predictors, and consequences. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 87-105.
Droogenbroeck, F. van, & Spruyt, B. (2021). Social pressure for religious conformity and anti-gay sentiment among Muslim and Christian youth. In X. Kuang, J. Zhu, & K. J. Kennedy (Eds.), Civic learning for alienated, disaffected and disadvantaged students (pp. 87-108). Routledge.
Duncan, C., Jones, K., & Moon, G. (1998). Context, composition and heterogeneity: Using multilevel models in health research. Social Science & Medicine, 46(1), 97-117.
Edlund, J., & Öun, I. (2023). Equal sharing or not at all caring? Ideals about fathers’ family involvement and the prevalence of the second half of the gender revolution in 27 societies. Journal of Family Studies, 29(6), 2576-2599. https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2023.2179531
Fan, P. L., & Marini, M. M. (2000). Influences on gender-role attitudes during the transition to adulthood. Social Science Research, 29(2), 258-283.
Fortin, N. M. (2005). Gender role attitudes and the labour-market outcomes of women across OECD countries. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 21(3), 416-438.
Fuwa, M. (2004). Macro-level gender inequality and the division of household labor in 22 countries. American Sociological Review, 69(6), 751-767.
Goossen, M. (2020). The gender gap in welfare state attitudes in Europe: The role of unpaid labour and family policy. Journal of European Social Policy, 30(4), 452-466.
Greenstein, T. N. (2000). Economic dependence, gender, and the division of labor in the home: A replication and extension. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(2), 322-335.
Gubernskaya, Z. (2010). Changing attitudes toward marriage and children in six countries. Sociological Perspectives, 53(2), 179-200. https://doi.org/10.1525/sop.2010.53.2.179
Haas, B. (2005). The work-care balance: Is it possible to identify typologies for cross-national comparisons? Current Sociology, 53(3), 487-508.
Hagqvist, E. (2018). Toward gender equality in practice? Cross-national patterns of change in the gendered division of housework over two decades. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 49(3), 355-377.
Hirata, H., & Kergoat, D. (2007). Novas configurações da divisão sexual do trabalho. Cadernos de Pesquisa, 37(132), 595-609. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-15742007000300005
Hofäcker, D., & Braun, S. (2022). The household division of labour in Europe: A multilevel perspective. In S. Bertolini, & B. Poggio, Research handbook on work-life balance: Emerging issues and methodological challenges (Chapter 7). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Hong, I., Kang, J. Y., & Lee, J. (2023). Better job prospects or an imperative to ‘just work’? A cross-national study on social investment and women’s employment. International Journal of Social Welfare, 32(3), 383-421.
Hox, J. J., & Maas, C. J. (2002). Sample sizes for multilevel modeling. In Social Science Methodology in the New Millennium: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Logic and Methodology (pp. 1-19). Leske & Budrich Verlag.
Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2003). Rising tide: Gender equality and cultural change around the world. Cambridge University Press.
Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence (Vol. 333). Cambridge University Press. Jorat, J. R., Evans, A., Höllinger, F. (2016). International Social Survey Programme: Family and Changing Gender Roles IV – ISSP 2012. GESIS Data Archive. https://doi.org/10.4232/1.12661
Khamis, N., & Ayuso, L. (2022). Female breadwinner: More egalitarian couples? An international comparison. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 43(3), 534-545.
Knudsen, K., & Wærness, K. (2001). National context, individual characteristics and attitudes on mothers’ employment: A comparative analysis of Great Britain, Sweden and Norway. Acta Sociologica, 44(1), 67-79.
Knudsen, K., & Wærness, K. (2008). National context and spouses’ Housework in 34 countries. European Sociological Review, 24(1), 97-113. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcm037
Kroska, A., & Elman, C. (2009). Change in attitudes about employed mothers: Exposure, interests, and gender ideology discrepancies. Social Science Research, 38(2), 366-382.
Lachance-Grzela, M., & Bouchard, G. (2010). Why do women do the lion’s share of housework? A decade of research. Sex Roles, 63(11), 767-780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9797-z
Landwerlin, G. M., Balsas, P. R., & García, J. R. (2020). Permisos para el cuidado de niños destinados a los padres: Evolución y sus efectos en la corresponsabilidad familiar. In K. Batthyány (Coord.), Miradas latinoamericanas a los cuidados (pp. 159-186). Clacso.
Lee, K. S. (2010). Gender, care work, and the complexity of family membership in Japan. Gender & Society, 24(5), 647-671.
Levanon, A., & Grusky, D. B. (2016). The persistence of extreme gender segregation in the twenty-first century. American Journal of Sociology, 122(2), 573-619.
Lomazzi, V., Israel, S., & Crespi, I. (2018). Gender equality in Europe and the effect of work-family balance policies on gender-role attitudes. Social Sciences, 8(1), Article 5.
Lomazzi, V., & Seddig, D. (2020). Gender role attitudes in the International Social Survey Programme: Cross-national comparability and relationships to cultural values. Cross-Cultural Research, 54(4), 398-431. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397120915454
Mandel, H., & Lazarus, A. (2021). Contextual effects on the gendered division of housework: A cross-country and cross-time analysis. Sex Roles, 85(3-4), 205-220.
Mandel, H., Lazarus, A., & Shaby, M. (2020). Economic exchange or gender identities? Housework division and wives’ economic dependency in different contexts. European Sociological Review, 36(6), 831-851.
Oláh, L. S., Vignoli, D., & Kotowska, I. E. (2021). Gender roles and families. In K. F. Zimmermann (Ed.), Handbook of Labor, Human Resources and Population Economics (pp. 1-28). Springer.
Picanço, F., Araújo, C. M. O., & Covre-Sussai, M. (2021). Papéis de gênero e divisão das tarefas domésticas segundo gênero e cor no Brasil: Outros olhares sobre as desigualdades. Revista Brasileira de Estudos de População, 38, Artigo e0177. https://doi.org/10.20947/s0102-3098a0177
Platt, L., & Polavieja, J. (2016). Saying and doing gender: Intergenerational transmission of attitudes towards the sexual division of labour. European Sociological Review, 32(6), 820-834.
Quadlin, N. (2020). From major preferences to major choices: Gender and logics of major choice. Sociology of Education, 93(2), 91-109.
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (Vol. 1). Sage.
Sjöberg, O. (2004). The role of family policy institutions in explaining gender-role attitudes: A comparative multilevel analysis of thirteen industrialized countries. Journal of European Social Policy, 14(2), 107-123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928704042003
Sorj, B. (2013). Arenas de cuidado nas interseções entre gênero e classe social no Brasil. Cadernos de Pesquisa, 43(149), 478-491. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-15742013000200006
Stickney, L. T., & Konrad, A. M. (2007). Gender-role attitudes and earnings: A multinational study of married women and men. Sex Roles, 57, 801-811.
Therborn, G. (2004). Between sex and power: Family in the world 1900-2000. Routledge.
Vespa, J. (2009). Gender ideology construction: A life course and intersectional approach. Gender & Society, 23(3), 363-387.
Yucel, D., & Chung, H. (2021). Working from home, work-family conflict, and the role of gender and gender role attitudes. Community Work & Family, 26(2), 190-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2021.1993138
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2024 Cadernos de Pesquisa
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
a. Autores mantêm os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
b. Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
c. Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho on-line (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre).