Exploração de decisões acadêmicas em estudantes de alta capacidade

Autores

Palavras-chave:

Relações de Gênero, Alunos com Altas Habilidades, Stem

Resumo

A escolha da carreira de alunos superdotados não está livre de dificuldades. No tocante à STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics), as mulheres superdotadas não escolhem tais áreas na mesma proporção que os homens. Tentou-se entender de que maneira os fatores contextuais influenciam as decisões acadêmicas. Trata-se de um estudo qualitativo no qual foram realizados oito focus groups de alunos superdotados e com interesses em STEM. Os resultados mostram os pais como modelos; no entanto, a mensagem paterna pode ser ameaçadora para as mulheres. Os professores inspiram e transmitem orientações claras baseadas mais em habilidades que em um desafio real. As atividades escolares permitem uma experiência direta com a disciplina, porém produzem pouca ligação com áreas reais de interesse.

Biografia do Autor

María Leonor Conejeros-Solar, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile.

Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile.

Marieta Valdivia-Lefort, University College London, United Kingdom.

University College London, United Kingdom.

Hernan Castillo-Hermosilla, Universidad Mayor, Santiago, Chile.

Universidad Mayor, Santiago, Chile.

Referências

AUSSERER, K.; KAUFMANN, C.; RISSER, R. The Focus Group Interview: a qualitative method to assess quality aspects of the traffic systems. Póster presentado en el 20th International Co-operation on Theories and Concepts in Traffic safety (ICTCT) workshop, Valencia, España, 2016, octubre.

BAHAR, A.; ADIGUZEL, T. Analysis of Factors Influencing Interest in STEM Career: Comparison between American and Turkish High School Students with High Ability. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations & Research, v. 17, n. 3, 2016.

BENÖLKEN, R. Giftedness, Gender and Motivation: the Impact of Mathematics Self-Efficacy, Interest and Attitudes as Determinants to Identify Mathematical Giftedness. Education Journal, v. 8, n. 5, p. 211-225, 2019.

BUDAY, S. K.; STAKE, J. E; PETERSON, Z. D. Gender and the choice of a science career: the impact of social support and possible selves, Sex Roles, v. 66, n. 3-4, p. 197-209, 2012.

CHAPMAN, F. Use of exchange-of-knowledge method for enhancing classroom environment and students’ attitudes and achievements in mathematics. 2012. Tesis (Doctoral) – Curtin University, Australia, 2012. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/yc9h3387. Acceso el: 2 Ener. 2019.

CHEN, C. P.; WONG, J. Career counseling for gifted students. Australian Journal of Career Development, v. 22, p. 121-129, 2013.

CHILE. Agencia de Calidad de Educación. Metodología de construcción de grupos socioeconómicos. Pruebas SIMCE 2012. Disponible en: http://archivos.agenciaeducacion.cl/Metodologia-de-Construccion-de-Grupos-Socioeconomicos-SIMCE-2012.pdf. Acceso el: 2 Ene. 2019.

CHILE. Ley n. 20.370, de 12 de septiembre de 2009. Establece la Ley General de Educación, Santiago, 2009.

CHILE. Ministerio de Educación. Decreto n. 341. Modifica decreto n. 230, de 2007, que establece normas que regulan el programa promoción de talentos en escuelas y liceos y fija texto refundido, Santiago, 2010.

COLEMAN, A. The authentic voice of gifted and talented black males regarding their motivation to engage in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics). IAGC Journal, p. 25-39, 2016.

CONEJEROS-SOLAR, M. L.; CÁCERES, P.; RIVEROS, A. M. Educación de Talentos Académicos en Chile: una década de aprendizajes e investigación. In: CATALÁN, J. (ed.). Investigación orientada al cambio en psicología educacional. La Serena: Editorial Universidad de La Serena, p. 39-74. 2012.

CONEJEROS-SOLAR, M. L.; GÓMEZ-ARIZAGA M. P, SANDOVAL-RODRIGUEZ, K.; CÁCERES, P. Aportes a la comprensión de la doble excepcionalidad: alta capacidad con trastorno por déficit de atención y alta capacidad con trastorno del espectro autista. Revista Educación, v. 42, n. 2, p. 645-676, 2018.

DÍAZ, C. Investigación cualitativa y análisis de contenido temático: Orientación intelectual de revista Universum. Revista General de la Información y Documentación, Universidad Complutense, p. 119-142, 2018.

DWECK, C. Carol Dweck revisits the growth mindset. Education Week, v. 35, n. 5, p. 20-24, 2015.

ESPINOZA, A. M.; TAUT, S. El Rol del Género en las Interacciones Pedagógicas de Aulas de Matemática Chilenas. Psykhe, v. 25, n. 2, p. 1-18, 2016. doi:10.7764/psykhe.25.2.858

FARFÁN MARQUEZ, R M.; SIMÓN RAMOS, M. G. El Desarrollo del Talento de las Mujeres en Matemáticas desde la Socioepistemología y la Perspectiva de Género: un Estudio de Biografías. Bolema: Boletim de Educação Matemática, v. 32, n. 62, p. 946-966, 2018.

FRASER, B. Test of Science Related Attitudes. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research, 1981.

GAGNÉ, F. De los genes al talento: la perspectiva DMGT/CMTD. Revista de Educación, v. 368, p. 12-39, 2015.

GALLAGHER, D. Examining secondary talented and gifted and agricultural education experiences relative to college major and career choice. 2019. Tesis (Magister) – Kansas State University, Kansas, 2019.

GHERASIM, L. R.; BUTNARU, S.; IACOB, L. The motivation, learning environment and school achievement. International Journal of Learning, v. 17, n. 12, p. 353-364, 2011.

GOMEZ-ARIZAGA, M. P.; TRUFFELLO, A.; KRAUSS, B. Percepciones parentales respecto a la experiencia académica y social de sus hijos con altas capacidades intelectuales. Perspectiva Educacional, Santiago, v. 58, n. 3, p. 156-177, 2019.

GRANADO, C.; CRUZ, C. Estilos parentales: influencia en el ajuste psicológico de niños y adolescentes con altas capacidades. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology, v. 1, n. 1, p. 353-362, 2010.

HÉBERT, T. P. A. Understanding the social and emotional lives of gifted students. Waco, TX: Prufrock, 2010.

HÉBERT, T. P. A. Longitudinal case study of exceptional leadership talent. Gifted Child Quarterly, v. 63, n. 1, p. 22-35, 2018.

HUTCHINSON, J. E. School Organization and STEM Career-related Learning. International Centre for Guidance Studies, University of Derby, Derby. 2013. Disponible en: http://derby.openrepository.com/derby/bitstream/10545/303288/8/STEM%20Leaders%20Report%2 02013%20%28High%20res%29.pdf. Acceso en: 2 ene. 2019.

HUTCHINSON, J. E.; LYONS, I. M.; ANSARI, D. More similar than different: gender differences in children’s basic numerical skills are the exception not the rule. Child development, v. 90, n. 1, p. 66-79, 2018.

IVIE, R.; CZUJKO, R.; STOWE, K. Women in physics, The IUPAP International Conference on Women in Physics, Paris, Francia, 7-9 Marzo 2002, AIP Conference proceedings, v. 628, p. 49-70, 2002.

JUNG, J.; YOUNG, M. The occupational/career decision-making processes of intellectually gifted adolescents from economically disadvantaged backgrounds: a mixed methods perspective. Gifted Child Quarterly, v. 63, n. 1, p. 36-57, 2018.

KAUFMAN, S. B.; STERNBERG, R. J. Conceptions of Giftedness. In: PFEIFFER, S. I. (Ed.) Handbook of Giftedness in Children. Florida: Springer, 2008. p. 71-91.

KERR, B.; SODANO, S. Career Assessment with Intellectually Gifted Students. Journal of Career Assessment, v. 11, n. 2, p. 168-86, 2003.

KIM, M. Focusing on the future: Experience from a career-related program for high-ability students and their parents. Gifted Child Today, v. 36, n. 1, p. 27-34, 2013.

KINGSBURY, K.; HEYLIGHEN, F. Vicky prefers Voltaire to Vogue: obstacles to the self-actualization of gifted women within social systems. 2019. Available at SSRN 3381601. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3381601

LEE, K. H.; SRIRAMAN, B. Gifted girls and nonmathematical aspirations: a longitudinal case study of two gifted Korean girls. Gifted Child Quarterly, v. 56, n. 1, p. 3-14, 2012.

LEPPEL, K.; WILLIAMS, M. L.; WALDAUER, C. The impact of parental occupation and socioeconomic status on choice of college. Major Journal of Family and Economic Issues, v. 22, n. 4, p. 373-394, 2001.

LIU, J.; McMAHON, M.; WATSON, M. Parental influence on child career development in mainland China: A qualitative study. The Career Development Quarterly, v. 63, n. 1, p. 74-87, 2015.

MATHEIS, S.; KELLER, L. K; KRONBORG, L.; SCHMITT, M.; PRECKEL, F. Do stereotypes strike twice? Giftedness and gender stereotypes in pre-service teachers’ beliefs about student characteristics in Australia, Asia-Pacific. Journal of Teacher Education, 2019.

MAXWELL, M. Career counseling is personal counseling: a constructivist approach to nurturing the development of gifted female adolescents. The Career Development Quarterly, v. 55, p. 206-218, 2007.

MENDEZ, L. M. R.; CRAWFORD, K. M. Gender-role stereotyping and career aspirations: a comparison of gifted early adolescent boys and girls. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, v. 13, n. 3, p. 96-107, 2002.

MILLER, K.; CUMMINGS, G. Gifted and talented students’ career aspirations and influences: A systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship I, v. 6, p. 1-26, 2009.

MILLER, D. I.; HALPERN, D. F. The new science of cognitive sex differences. Trends in cognitive sciences, v. 18, n. 1, p. 37-45, 2014.

MULLET, D. R.; KETTLER, T.; SABATINI, A. Gifted students’ conceptions of their high school STEM education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, v. 41, n. 1, p. 60-92, 2018.

MURATORI, M.; SMITH, C. Guiding the talent and career development of the gifted individual. Journal of Counseling and Development, v. 93, p. 173-183, 2015.

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR GIFTED CHILDREN – NAGC. What is Giftedness? Disponible en: https://www.nagc.org/. Acceso en: Junio 2020.

NAVARRO, M.; FORSTER, C.; GONZÁLEZ, C.; GONZALEZ-POSE, P. Attitudes towards science: measurement and psychometric properties of the Test of Science-Related Attitudes for its use in Spanish-speaking classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, v. 38, n. 9, p. 1459-1482, 2016.

NOWICKI, E. A.; LOPATA, J. Children’s implicit and explicit gender stereotypes about mathematics and reading ability. Social Psychology Education, v. 20, p. 329-345, 2017.

OGUTU, P. J. Learning environment, achievement motivation and career decision making among gifted secondary school students. American Journal of Education and Learning, v. 4, n. 1, p. 50-61, 2019.

OGURLU, Ü.; KAYA, F.; HIZLI, E. Career decisions of gifted students in Turkey. Journal of European Education (JEE), v. 5, n. 1, p. 31-45, 2015.

ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT – OECD. The ABC of gender equality in education: aptitude, behavior, confidence. Paris, France: OECD, 2015.

PETERSON, J. Gender differences in identification of gifted youth and in gifted program participation: A meta-analysis. Contemporary Educational Psychology, v. 38, p. 342-348, 2013.

PFEIFFER, S. I. Serving the gifted: evidence-based clinical and psychoeducational practice. New York: Routledge, 2013.

REYES-HOUSHOLDER, C.; ROQUE, B. Chile 2018: desafíos al poder de género desde la Calle hasta la Moneda. Revista de Ciencia Política, Santiago, v. 39, n. 2, p. 191-215, 2019.

RYSIEW, K. J.; SHORE, B. M; LEEB, R. T. Multipotentiality, giftedness, and career choice: a review. Journal of Counseling & Development, v. 77, n. 4, p. 423-430, 1999.

SCANTLEBURY, K.; BAKER, Dale. Remembering where the difference lies. In: ABELL, Sandra K.; LEDERMAN, Norman G. (ed.). Handbook of research on science education. New York; London: Routledge, 2007. p. 257-285.

SHERMAN S. J. Examining the influence of perceived parental academic pressure and absence on affluent, high-achieving adolescents. Tesis (Doctoral) – Azusa Pacific University, Mayo, 2016.

STEENBERGEN-HU, S.; OLSZEWSKI-KUBILIUS, P. Factors that contributed to gifted students’ success on STEM pathways: the role of race, personal interests, and aspects of high school experiences. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, v. 40, n. 2, p. 99-134, 2017.

STOET, G.; GEARY, D. C. The Gender-Equality Paradox in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education. Psychological Science, v. 29, n. 4, p. 581-593, 2018.

TIRRI, K.; KUUSISTO, E. What factors contribute to the development of gifted female scientists? Insight from two case studies. In: TABER, K. et al. (org.). Teaching Gifted Learners in STEM Subjects. New York: Routledge, 2018. p. 80-88.

TWEEDALE, N.; KRONBORG, L. What contributes to gifted adolescent females’ talent development at a high-achieving, secondary girls’ school? Gifted and Talented International, v. 30, n. 1-2, p. 6-18, 2015.

VU, P.; HARSHBARGER, D.; CROW, S.; HENDERSON, S. Why STEM? Factors that influence gifted students’ choice of college majors. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science (IJTES), v. 3, n. 2, p. 63-71, 2019.

WAI, J.; LUBINSKI, D.; BENBOW, C. P.; STEIGER, J. H. Accomplishments in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) and its relation to STEM Educational Dose: a 25-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, v. 102, n. 4, p. 860-871, 2010.

WATTERS, J. J. Career decision making among gifted students: the mediation of teachers. Gifted Child Quarterly, v. 54, n. 3, p. 222-238, 2010.

WATTERS, J. J.; DIEZMANN, C. M. Engaging elementary students in learning science: an analysis of classroom dialogue. Instructional Science, v. 44, p. 25-42, 2015.

Publicado

16-11-2020

Edição

Seção

Artigos