Estudos em Avaliação Educacional https://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/eae <p>Created in 1990 as a spin-off of the journal Educação e Seleção (1980-1989), Estudos em Avaliação Educacional was published quarterly until 2020, when it became a continuous publication in 2021. It publishes studies related to educational evaluation and to the analysis of policies and programs interrelated with evaluation and/or which may inform evaluative studies, welcoming works in various humanities fields and with diverse theoretical-methodological approaches, enabling the exchange of information and the academic debate.</p> <p>Estudos em Avaliação Educacional is ranked A1 in Education by the CAPES’ Qualis index.</p> <p>ISSN: 0103-6831 | e-ISSN: 1984-932X</p> pt-BR <p>Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:</p> <p>a. Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the paper simultaneously licensed under the <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt-br">Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0)</a> license that allows the sharing of the paper with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.</p> <p>b. Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the paper published in this journal (for example publishing in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.</p> <p>c. Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their paper on-line (for example in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any moment before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes, as well as increase the impact and citation of the published paper (See <a href="http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html">The Effect of Open Access</a>).</p> eae@fcc.org.br (Nelson Gimenes) eae@fcc.org.br (Camila Maria Camargo de Oliveira) Tue, 28 Jan 2025 12:14:03 -0300 OJS 3.3.0.19 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 Assessment of professional education in federal institutes: Systematic mapping https://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/eae/article/view/10289 <p>The purpose of this Systematic Literature Mapping (SLM) was to identify the most common assessment approaches in middle-level vocational education, the contributions and challenges of the assessment process, the analysis of the timing of assessments, and the understanding of the implications of the findings in the improvement and enhancement of these courses. To carry out the MSL, we searched for articles in academic journals over the last ten years (2012-2022) in the B-On, SciELO, and Scopus databases. The findings indicate that assessments of programs or courses are usually carried out through questionnaires and interviews at the end of training. The studies analyzed in this research do not go into further details to identify how these findings are used in curricular adjustments.</p> Luciana Conceição Argôlo Correia, Alexandre Ventura, Thiago Souto Mendes Copyright (c) 2025 Estudos em Avaliação Educacional https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/eae/article/view/10289 Mon, 31 Mar 2025 00:00:00 -0300 The institutionalization of social impact metrics: The case of Unifesp https://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/eae/article/view/10295 <p>This article presents a framework for institutionalizing Social Impact Metrics (SIM) for the Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp) based on the United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). It is based on sociological institutionalism and the dynamics of the Times Higher Education (THE) ranking. The framework integrates university policies with the SDGs and aligns teaching, research, extension and cultural activities as a dialogic interface with society. The methods employed include design methods, design science research and Scott’s analytical pillars (regulative, normative and cognitive cultural). As a result, a SIM-Unifesp framework was developed establishing principles of institutional analysis based on metrics.</p> Gabriela de Brelaz, Izabel Patrícia Meister, Vanderlin Amorim Palmeira Júnior, Guilherme Sydow Nunes Bueno Brandão, Lidiane Cristina da Silva, Alexsandro Cardoso Carvalho Copyright (c) 2025 Estudos em Avaliação Educacional https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/eae/article/view/10295 Thu, 20 Feb 2025 00:00:00 -0300 On how to measure differences in educational outcomes https://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/eae/article/view/10663 <p>The article shows that the Kullback-Leibler divergence is not appropriate for comparing distributions of learning assessment grades, as is done in various published studies. This article argues that when the aim is to evaluate the inequality of score or education distributions, it is reasonable to employ a commonly used measure of inequality, such as the Gini index. The article also shows that it is not appropriate to use the Kullback-Leibler divergence as a measure of grade inequality between categories of students. To illustrate the use of various statistical measures and procedures, an analysis is conducted on the distribution of educational attainment among employed individuals in Brazil and its states, using data from the 2022 Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílios Contínua [Continuous National Household Sample Survey].</p> Rodolfo Hoffmann Copyright (c) 2025 Estudos em Avaliação Educacional https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/eae/article/view/10663 Thu, 13 Feb 2025 00:00:00 -0300 Pisa contextual questionnaires in educational research: A systematic review https://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/eae/article/view/10949 <p>This article presents a systematic review of the literature in journals, using the Prisma method to analyze academic studies that use contextual questionnaires from the Programme for International Student Assessment (Pisa). A total of 22 articles were selected and classified into three categories of analysis: student educational performance; environmental, socio-emotional, and political factors; and psychometric quality. The studies address different perspectives across various contexts, with a predominant focus on the use of the student questionnaire as an analytical tool. The significant number of comparative studies between countries stands out. However, there have been few analyses carried out in the South American context.</p> Talita Emidio Andrade Soares, Wagner dos Santos Copyright (c) 2025 Estudos em Avaliação Educacional https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/eae/article/view/10949 Tue, 28 Jan 2025 00:00:00 -0300 Mediated assessment of children aged 2 to 5 years https://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/eae/article/view/11294 <p>The text presents an assessment protocol for children aged 2 to 5 years, and is based on development scales: the Base Nacional Comum Curricular [National Common Curriculum Base] and the curriculum for early childhood education. The agenda for recording the results includes covers the areas to be assessed and the necessary materials, as well as a space for notes. This is a mediated assessment proposal, in which the evaluator pays attention to the child’s strategies, intentionally and systematically intervenes and mediates, with a view to understanding the child’s actual and potential knowledge and skills. The results of the assessments carried out so far indicate the feasibility of the instrument for application and its contribution to the planning of pedagogical interventions in the preschool phase.</p> Nerli Nonato Ribeiro Mori, Naira Natieli de Araújo Novello Copyright (c) 2025 Estudos em Avaliação Educacional https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/eae/article/view/11294 Fri, 31 Jan 2025 00:00:00 -0300