Avaliação da qualidade da educação infantil na Austrália

Collette Tayler

Resumo


O presente trabalho apresenta o esquema do novo sistema de qualidade da educação infantil implementado na Austrália, relatando a pesquisa que foi designada para configurar a avaliação e a pontuação de desempenho com base nos padrões acordados. As etapas da implementação foram planejadas para assegurar a validade, a confiabilidade e a aplicação consistente do instrumento de avaliação em todo o país. Evidências preliminares foram apresentadas nos resultados desse processo de avaliação da qualidade. Questões e processos relativos à implementação revelam as principais áreas que merecem atenção quando um país se empenha em melhorar a qualidade de seus serviços de educação e cuidados infantis, especialmente em sociedades que apresentam um sistema complexo, com diferentes níveis de governo e em que a população é composta de grupos culturais, linguísticos e étnicos diversos.


Palavras-chave


AVALIAÇÃO DA QUALIDADE; EDUCAÇÃO INFANTIL; AUSTRÁLIA; POLÍTICAS PÚBLICAS

Texto completo:

PDF

Referências


AUSTRALIA. Council of Australian Governments. Investing in the early years. A national early childhood development strategy. July 2009. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 2009a.

______. Department Of Education, Employment And Workplace Relations. Belonging being and becoming: the early years learning framework for Australia. Canberra: DEEWR, 2009b.

______. Towards a national quality framework for early childhood education and care: Report of the Expert dvisory Panel on Quality Early Childhood Education and Care, January 2009, 2009c. Disponível em:

deewr.gov.au/EarlyChildhood/OfficeOfEarlyChildhood/agenda/Documents/EAP_report.pdf>. Acesso em: jan. 2011.

______. My Time Our Place: Framework for School Age Care in Australia. Canberra: DEEWR, 2011a.

______. New South Wales Government. Education and Care Services National Regulations, 2011b. Disponível em: . Acesso em: ago. 2014.

AUSTRALIAN CHILDREN’S EDUCATION AND CARE QUALITY AUTHORITY. Guide to the National Quality Standard. Sydney: ACECQA, 2011.

______. National Quality Standard for Early Childhood Education and Care and

School Age Care. Sydney: ACECQA, 2012a.

______. National Quality Standard Assessment and Rating Instrument. Sydney:

ACECQA, 2012b.

______. NQF Snapshot. Q1, 2014. A quarterly report from the Australian Children’s Education and Care Quality Authority, May 2014. Disponível em: . Acesso em: ago. 2014.

AUSTRALIAN COUNCIL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH (ACER). Evaluation of the Assessment and Rating Process under the National Quality Standard for Early Childhood Education and Care and School Age Care. Melbourne: ACER, 2012.

AUSTRALIAN PRODUCTIVITY COMMISSION. Report on Government Services 2014,

Disponível em: . Acesso em: ago. 2014.

BOURDIEU, P. The forms of capital. In: SZEMAN, I.; KAPOSY, T. (Ed.). Cultural theory. An anthology. West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011. p. 81-93.

BRIDGES, W. Transitions: making sense of life’s changes. Massachusetts: Addison Wesley, 1980.

BURCHINAL, M. R.; CRYER, D. Diversity, child care quality, and developmental outcomes. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, v. 18, p. 401-426, 2003.

BURCHINAL, M. R.; PEISNER-FEINBERG, E. S.; BRYANT, D.; CLIFFORD, R. M. Children’s social and cognitive development and child care quality: testing for differential associations related to poverty, gender, or ethnicity. Applied

Developmental Science, v. 4, n. 3, p. 149-165, 2000.

BURCHINAL, M. R.; ROBERTS, J. E.; NABORS, L. A.; BRYANT, D. M. Quality of center child care and infant cognitive and language development. Child Development, v. 67, p. 606-620, 1996.

CAMPBELL, F.; CONTI, G.; HECKMAN, J. J.; SEONG, H. M.; PINTO, R.; PUNGELLO, L.; PAN, Y. Early Childhood Investments Substantially Boost Adult Health. Science, v. 343, p. 1478-1485, 2014.

DICKINSON, D. K.; SMITH, M. W. Supporting language and literacy development in the preschool classroom. In Dickinson, D. K.; Tabors, P. O. (Ed.). Beginning literacy with language: young children learning at home and school (p. 139-148). Baltimore, MD: Brookes, 2001.

HAMRE, B. K.; PIANTA, R. C. Early teacher-child relationships and the trajectory of children’s school outcomes through eighth grade. Child Development, v. 72, n. 2, p. 625-638, 2001.

HAMRE, B.; HATFIELD, B.; PIANTA, R.; JAMIL, F. Evidence for General and Domain-Specific Elements of Teacher-Child Interactions: Associations With Preschool Children’s Development. Child Development, p. 1-18, 2013.

HARRIS HELM, J.; KATZ, L. Young Investigators. The Project Approach in the Early Years. 2nd. ed. New York: Teachers College Press, 2011.

HOWES, C.; BURCHINAL, M.; PIANTA, R.; BRYANT, D.; EARLY, D.; CLIFFORD, R.; BARBARIN, O. Ready to learn? Children’s pre-academic achievement in pre-kindergarten programs. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, v. 23, p. 27-50, 2008.

ISHIMINE, K.; TAYLER, C.; BENNETT, J. Quality and Early Childhood Education and Care. International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy, v. 4, n. 2, p. 67-80, 2010.

LANDRY, S. H.; SWANK, P. R.; SMITH, K. E.; ASSEL, M. A.; VELLET, S. Does early responsive parenting have a special importance for children’s development or is consistency across early childhood necessary? Developmental Psychology, v. 37, p. 387-403, 2001.

MASHBURN, A. J.; PIANTA, R. C.; HAMRE, B. K.; DOWNER, J. T.; BARBARIN, O. A.; BRYANT, D.; BURCHINAL, M.; EARLY, D. M.; HOWES, C. Measures of classroom quality in prekindergarten and children’s development of academic, language, and social skills. Child Development, v. 79, n. 3,

p. 732-749, 2008.

NATIONAL CHILDCARE ACCREDITATION COUNCIL. Quality Improvement and Accreditation System Handbook. Commonwealth of Australia: NCAC, 1993.

NEUMAN, S. B.; CARTA, J. J. Advancing the measurement of quality for early childhood programs that support early language and literacy development. In: Zaslow , M.; Matinez -Beck, I.; Tout, K.; Halle, T. (Ed.). Quality Measurement in early childhood settings. Baltimore, MD: Brookes, 2011. p. 51–76.

ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT. Starting strong II. Paris: OECD, 2006.

PEISNER-FEINBERG, E. et al. The relation of preschool childcare quality to children’s social development through second grade. Child Development, v. 72, p. 1534-1553, 2001.

PESSANHA, M.; AGUIAR, C.; BAIRRAO, J. Influence of structural features on Portuguese toddler child care quality. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, v. 22, n. 2, p. 204-214, 2007.

PIANTA, R. C.; BARNETT, S. W.; BURCHINAL, M.; THORNBURG, K. R. The Effects of Preschool Education: What We Know, How Public Policy Is or Is Not Aligned With the Evidence Base, and What We Need to Know.

Psychological Science in the Public Interest, v. 10, n. 2, p. 49-88, 2009.

PUTNAM, R. Bowling alone. New York: Simon and Schuster, 2000.

SABOL, T. J.; SOLIDAY HONG, S. L.; PIANTA, R. C.; BURCHINAL, M. R. Canrating pre-K programs predict children’s learning? Science, v. 341, p. 845-846, 2013. Disponível em: . Acesso em: ago. 2014.

SHONKOFF, J. P.; PHILLIPS, D. A. From Neurons to Neighborhoods. The Science of Early Childhood Development. Washington DC: National Academic

Press, 2000.

SIRAJ-BLATCHFORD, I.; MAYO, A.; MELHUISH, E.; TAGGART, B.; SAMMONS, P.; SYLVA, K. Performing against the odds: developmental trajectories of children in the EPPSE 3-16 study. Research Brief DFE-RB128, 2011. Disponível em: . Acesso em: ago. 2014.

SYLVA, K.; MELHUISH, E.; SAMMONS, P.; SIRAJ-BLATCHFORD, I.; TAGGART, B. Pre-school quality and educational outcomes at age 11: low quality has little benefit. Journal of Early Childhood Research, v. 9, n. 2, p. 109-124, 2011.

TOUT, K.; ZASLOW, M. Measuring the Quality of Early Care and Education Programs at the Intersection of Research, Policy and Practice. Research-to-Policy, Research-to-Practice Brief, OPRE 2011-10a, Dec. 2010.

VICTORIAN GOVERNMENT. Education and Care Services National Law Act. No.69 of 2010. Melbourne: Government the State of Victoria, 2010.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18222/eae255820142850

Apontamentos

  • Não há apontamentos.